Bug#898727: Please provide adt-virt-* names, at least for buster

2019-07-26 Thread Simon McVittie
Control: tags -1 + wontfix On Tue, 15 May 2018 at 20:09:47 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > Martin Pitt writes ("Re: Bug#898727: Please provide adt-virt-* names, at > least for buster"): > > These were deprecated > > two years ago (with warning messages) and removed one

Bug#898727: Please provide adt-virt-* names, at least for buster

2018-05-15 Thread Ian Jackson
Martin Pitt writes ("Re: Bug#898727: Please provide adt-virt-* names, at least for buster"): > Control: tag -1 moreinfo ... > Do you have examples of such "expectations"? These were deprecated > two years ago (with warning messages) and removed one year ago, with

Bug#898727: Please provide adt-virt-* names, at least for buster

2018-05-15 Thread Martin Pitt
Control: tag -1 moreinfo Hello Ian, Ian Jackson [2018-05-15 14:44 +0100]: > These names are part of an external interface. It is not very > friendly to just remove them them. > > This is particularly true because other programs have an expectation > that they can have the user specify `foo'

Bug#898727: Please provide adt-virt-* names, at least for buster

2018-05-15 Thread Ian Jackson
Package: autopkgtest Version: 5.3.1 These names are part of an external interface. It is not very friendly to just remove them them. This is particularly true because other programs have an expectation that they can have the user specify `foo' and then run `adt-virt-foo' from PATH. Ian. --