Bug#901193: Bug#901003: There is no standard way of removing transitional / dummy packages

2019-03-28 Thread Paul Gevers
Control: tags -1 pending On 28-03-2019 01:22, vincent.mcint...@csiro.au wrote: > Works for me. And for me. So I have locally committed the attached changes which I will push if no comments appear in the next two days. Paul From 6eb5bd59864b26b9b56b1e3b591e9e77cffef374 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001

Bug#901193: Bug#901003: There is no standard way of removing transitional / dummy packages

2019-03-27 Thread Vincent.Mcintyre
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 12:17:41AM +, Justin B Rye wrote: > vincent.mcint...@csiro.au wrote: > >> + > >> + The package descriptions for transitional dummy packages usually > >> indicate their > >> + purpose. However, they are not uniform; in particular, some > >> dummy > >> +

Bug#901193: Bug#901003: There is no standard way of removing transitional / dummy packages

2019-03-27 Thread Justin B Rye
vincent.mcint...@csiro.au wrote: >> + >> + The package descriptions for transitional dummy packages usually >> indicate their >> + purpose. However, they are not uniform; in particular, some >> dummy >> + packages are designed to be kept installed (e.g. to express a >>

Bug#901193: Bug#901003: There is no standard way of removing transitional / dummy packages

2019-03-27 Thread Vincent.Mcintyre
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 11:34:20PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Wed, 2019-03-27 at 22:52 +, vincent.mcint...@csiro.au wrote: > [...] > > I agree with everything you've said about this text but as regards > > the patch I think some mention of tracking packages should be kept. > > Something

Bug#901193: Bug#901003: There is no standard way of removing transitional / dummy packages

2019-03-27 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2019-03-27 at 22:52 +, vincent.mcint...@csiro.au wrote: [...] > I agree with everything you've said about this text but as regards > the patch I think some mention of tracking packages should be kept. > Something like: > > One class of dummy package that are not intended to be

Bug#901193: Bug#901003: There is no standard way of removing transitional / dummy packages

2019-03-27 Thread Vincent.Mcintyre
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 02:23:41PM +, Justin B Rye wrote: > diff --git a/en/upgrading.dbk b/en/upgrading.dbk > index a22924f3..37fa449d 100644 > --- a/en/upgrading.dbk > +++ b/en/upgrading.dbk > @@ -1311,24 +1311,25 @@ $ aptitude purge '~c' > > > > -Dummy packages > - > -

Bug#901193: Bug#901003: There is no standard way of removing transitional / dummy packages

2019-03-27 Thread Justin B Rye
Further thoughts on a revised version: > Dummy packages > > Some packages from have been split into several > packages in , often to improve system maintainability. To > ease the upgrade path in such cases, often provides > dummy packages: empty packages that have the same name

Bug#901193: Bug#901003: There is no standard way of removing transitional / dummy packages

2019-03-26 Thread Justin B Rye
Paul Gevers wrote: > I wonder what is missing there from the perspective of this bug. The > section about dummy packages exists since before 2009 and currently reads: > ''' > Dummy packages > > Some packages from have been split into several > packages in , often to improve system

Bug#901193: Bug#901003: There is no standard way of removing transitional / dummy packages

2019-03-26 Thread Paul Gevers
Control: tags -1 moreinfo On Sun, 10 Jun 2018 02:15:51 +0100 Ben Hutchings wrote: > > Perhaps a better location would be the upgrading chapter of the release > > notes? [1] > > > > That includes various things that one can do to clean up your system > > after the upgrade; removing transitional