Bug#901289: New upstream home?

2018-12-29 Thread Jesse Smith
On 12/29/18 2:33 PM, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > [2018-12-27 16:07] Jesse Smith >> I like the idea of migrating logsave over to the sysvinit tree and that >> way, as Ted pointed out, we have it as an optional logging tool for the >> entire init.d collection of scripts. Seems like this would be a

Bug#901289: New upstream home?

2018-12-29 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
[2018-12-27 16:07] Jesse Smith > > I like the idea of migrating logsave over to the sysvinit tree and that > way, as Ted pointed out, we have it as an optional logging tool for the > entire init.d collection of scripts. Seems like this would be a fairly > straight forward way to make sure the

Bug#901289: New upstream home?

2018-12-27 Thread Jesse Smith
I like the idea of migrating logsave over to the sysvinit tree and that way, as Ted pointed out, we have it as an optional logging tool for the entire init.d collection of scripts. Seems like this would be a fairly straight forward way to make sure the dependency is in place and possibly give us

Bug#901289: New upstream home?

2018-12-27 Thread Theodore Y. Ts'o
Regarding in-kernel recovery "being good enough". The reason why some file systems and system administrators prefer to run fsck at boot, even you can there is "in-kernel recovery", is that journal/log replay only works on an unclean shutdown. However, sometimes there are can be file system

Bug#901289: New upstream home?

2018-12-27 Thread Jesse Smith
On 12/27/18 6:01 AM, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 09:36:22AM +, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=logsave shows no other users -- > just > src:sysvinit and src:initramfs-tools, but if you're paranoid, it doesn't > have to be named "logsave". > I

Bug#901289: New upstream home?

2018-12-27 Thread Adam Borowski
On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 09:36:22AM +, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > [ Added e2fsprogs maintainer into thread ] > > [2018-12-25 18:39] Jesse Smith > > If it would be of help, I'd be happy to adopt the logsave program > > upstream in the SysV init tree. Seems like the sort of tool that would > > be

Bug#901289: New upstream home?

2018-12-27 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
[ Added e2fsprogs maintainer into thread ] [2018-12-25 18:39] Jesse Smith > If it would be of help, I'd be happy to adopt the logsave program > upstream in the SysV init tree. Seems like the sort of tool that would > be mostly used during start-up and initscript usage. > > That way we could

Bug#901289: New upstream home?

2018-12-25 Thread Jesse Smith
If it would be of help, I'd be happy to adopt the logsave program upstream in the SysV init tree. Seems like the sort of tool that would be mostly used during start-up and initscript usage. That way we could be pretty sure logsave was available whenever initscripts were being used. Thoughts? -