Hi Sandro,
>> Friendly ping on this?
>
> this was supposed to be fixed when i uploaded that version. Anyhow,
> i've just uploaded 0.10.0 to unstable, can you check that version
> out?
There are a large number of distinct issues here which will require
different solutions, not all of them
> Friendly ping on this?
this was supposed to be fixed when i uploaded that version. Anyhow,
i've just uploaded 0.10.0 to unstable, can you check that version
out? if it's still FTBR maybe give a ping upstream about it?
Thanks,
--
Sandro "morph" Tosi
My website: http://sandrotosi.me/
Me at
Chris Lamb wrote:
> [..]
Friendly ping on this?
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
reopen 901307
found 901307 0.7.0-1
thanks
Hi,
Alas, I think this issue has come back. lmfit-py 1.0.1-1 in unstable
right now is being built with sphinx-gallery 0.7.0-1 but I am seeing:
- **Total running time of the script:** ( 0 minutes 0.443 seconds)
+ **Total running time of the
forwarded 901307 https://github.com/sphinx-gallery/sphinx-gallery/pull/390
thanks
I've forwarded this upstream here:
https://github.com/sphinx-gallery/sphinx-gallery/pull/390
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
Source: sphinx-gallery
Version: 0.1.13-2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
Whilst working on the Reproducible Builds effort [0], we noticed
that sphinx-gallery could
6 matches
Mail list logo
