Package: ntp
Followup-For: Bug #901363
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
Upgrading kernel to one that had the
Package: ntp
Version: 1:4.2.8p11+dfsg-1
Followup-For: Bug #901363
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
Ran with a
Package: ntp
Version: 1:4.2.8p11+dfsg-1
Followup-For: Bug #901363
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
* What was
Package: ntp
Version: 1:4.2.8p11+dfsg-1
Followup-For: Bug #901363
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
* What was
Package: ntp
Version: 1:4.2.8p11+dfsg-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
Noticing that time had drifted when running new kernels:
12 Jun 12:07:53
ntpdate[5469]: step time server
5 matches
Mail list logo