Hi,
On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 07:18:02PM +0200, Vincas Dargis wrote:
> We have now mesa abstraction in Buster that fixes this bug...
So >= 2.13 as for dri-enumerate? I don't see something specific in the
Debian changelog?
> but so what? I
> guess I'll have to add yet another [0] backport to
We have now mesa abstraction in Buster that fixes this bug... but so what? I guess I'll have to add
yet another [0] backport to upstream profile because it exists not only for Buster...
I am thinking to propose LibreOffice upstream to split profile into apparmor-x.yz directories to
match
Vincas Dargis:
> Cool, I will work on MR.
:)))
Also, would be good to have a 2.13.x upstream release with the
fixes/improvements we need.
> "Why not" could be "don't want to manage backports too much" :) .
Right, at least not without being aware of a real need.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
On 8/4/18 6:22 PM, intrigeri wrote:
or else maybe we could backport `mesa` abstraction into AppArmor
2.13?
Why not. Create a MR or file a bug against src:apparmor?
Cool, I will work on MR. "Why not" could be "don't want to manage backports too
much" :) .
Vincas Dargis:
> intrigeri, are we getting AppArmor 3 in Buster,
Impossible to predict at this point.
> or else maybe we could backport `mesa` abstraction into AppArmor
> 2.13?
Why not. Create a MR or file a bug against src:apparmor?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
intrigeri, are we getting AppArmor 3 in Buster, or else maybe we could backport `mesa` abstraction
into AppArmor 2.13?
Package: libreoffice-common
Version: 1:6.1.0~rc2-3
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
User: pkg-apparmor-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: modify-profile
Dear Maintainer,
I got this deny:
```
type=AVC msg=audit(1533391970.983:584): apparmor="DENIED" operation="open"
7 matches
Mail list logo
