tags 909511 + pending
thanks
Fixed in Git, pending upload:
https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/commit/0da150d2f08ec8ccddbd0de217fc813deef17b55
checks/scripts.desc| 17 +
checks/scripts.pm | 9
On 2018-09-26 10:20, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Thanks for the changelog entry; any update on the tag description? Thanks!
update-inetd demoted the error to a warning for now: #909758
let me try some description:
The maintainer scripts contain calls to update-inetd with invalid
parameter combinations.
Hi Andreas,
> The relevant changelog entry:
[…]
> I'll think about a tag description later.
Thanks for the changelog entry; any update on the tag description? Thanks!
Best wishes,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
On 2018-09-24 20:19, Chris Lamb wrote:
>> update-inetd got more strict recently w.r.t. valid option combinations
>
> Thanks for this. Can you draft a very rough tag description for this?
>
> I think I would also love to see which version got stricter (vs
> "recently") — it is not immediately
tags 909511 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi Andreas,
> update-inetd got more strict recently w.r.t. valid option combinations
Thanks for this. Can you draft a very rough tag description for this?
I think I would also love to see which version got stricter (vs
"recently") — it is not immediately clear
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.50.4
Severity: normal
Hi,
update-inetd got more strict recently w.r.t. valid option combinations,
and now errors out with
update-inetd: error: --group is only relevant with --add
update-inetd: error: --pattern is not relevant with --add
Some offenders:
LP:
6 matches
Mail list logo
