Bug#909523: [pkg-apparmor] Bug#909523: cachefilesd broken by apparmor

2018-10-25 Thread intrigeri
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo Control: retitle -1 Default configuration is incompatible with a non-SELinux active LSM Control: severity -1 important Anthony DeRobertis: > Seems your hypothesis is correct. > [...] > I then went ahead and edited cachefilesd.conf and commented out the > secctx line.

Bug#909523: [pkg-apparmor] Bug#909523: cachefilesd broken by apparmor

2018-10-24 Thread Anthony DeRobertis
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 10:24:46AM +0200, intrigeri wrote: > > Can you please retry with AppArmor enabled, after commenting out the > "secctx" directive in /etc/cachefilesd.conf? If this works, then my > hypothesis will be confirmed and my recommendation will be: Seems your hypothesis is

Bug#909523: [pkg-apparmor] Bug#909523: cachefilesd broken by apparmor

2018-10-21 Thread intrigeri
Control: user pkg-apparmor-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org Control: usertags -1 help-needed Control: tag -1 + moreinfo Hi, Anthony DeRobertis: > I rebooted after enabling Apparmor, and cachefilesd wouldn't start: > Sep 24 13:53:17 Zia cachefilesd[1105]: About to bind cache > Sep 24 13:53:17 Zia

Bug#909523: cachefilesd broken by apparmor

2018-10-14 Thread Vincent Van Houtte
I can confirm both the issue and the workaround. Online sources seem to indicate that one can write an AppArmor profile for any daemon... I'm more than happy to contribute by testing and get this one solved. Kr, Vincent

Bug#909523: cachefilesd broken by apparmor

2018-09-24 Thread Anthony DeRobertis
Package: cachefilesd Version: 0.10.10-0.1 Severity: important Important since Apparmor is on by default now. I rebooted after enabling Apparmor, and cachefilesd wouldn't start: Sep 24 13:53:17 Zia cachefilesd[1105]: About to bind cache Sep 24 13:53:17 Zia kernel: CacheFiles: Security denies