Hi,
Daniel Kahn Gillmor (2018-10-29):
> On Sun 2018-10-28 21:58:55 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > I don't have any objections if you want to upload already, but it
> > won't get accepted into p-u from stable-new until it's had the d-i
> > ack.
>
> OK, it's uploaded now, in stable-new,
On Sun 2018-10-28 21:58:55 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> I don't have any objections if you want to upload already, but it won't
> get accepted into p-u from stable-new until it's had the d-i ack.
OK, it's uploaded now, in stable-new, waiting for the d-i ack.
thanks for your work on the stable
On Sun 2018-10-28 10:58:17 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On Sat 2018-10-27 16:47:27 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> Are you planning on handling the enigmail upload as well? I can't see
>> an open p-u bug for it so, given the timings, would suggest that start
>> getting progressed ASAP so
On Sun, 2018-10-28 at 10:58 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On Sat 2018-10-27 16:47:27 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[...]
> > I know you mentioned that the changes shouldn't affect gpgv
> > (particularly as used in d-i), but the udeb still means that the
> > upload
> > needs an explicit ack,
On Sat 2018-10-27 16:47:27 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> As it turns out, that was quite a lot of noise indeed - about 1/3 of
> the ~3300 line diff, from my visual scan-and-chop. Apologies for the
> delay, but I've finally managed to carve out a block of time to handle
> this.
apologies for the
Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i
On Fri, 2018-10-05 at 17:48 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> I'd like to update the version of GnuPG in debian stable with a
> series of targeted bugfixes (most of which are backported from
> upstream).
[...]
> The debdiff contains some minor updates to patch
Hi Adam--
On Tue 2018-10-23 16:18:05 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Sure, but that's not what I said. My distinction was between including
> the gnupg update in the point release versus pushing it more urgently
> via stable-updates. I never implied the updates shouldn't be released at
> all.
On Tue 2018-10-23 20:00:06 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> From discussions elsewhere, I understand that the "raw" upstream
> enigmail - i.e. installed via upstream's addons service - is actually
> already compatible with the new Thunderbird version, and the problem
> only affects the Debian
On Tue, 2018-10-23 at 10:35 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> The fact that the upstream-supported version of enigmail that works
> with the upcoming stretch version of thunderbird depends on these
> fixes is, as you say, another reason to suggest inclusion in debian
> stretch.
>From
On 2018-10-23 15:35, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
Thanks to Adam for your ongoing work on the stable releases!
I just wanted to clarify a few points here.
On Tue 2018-10-23 08:57:08 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
An issue is that the gnupg update itself doesn't really qualify for
stable-updates
Thanks to Adam for your ongoing work on the stable releases!
I just wanted to clarify a few points here.
On Tue 2018-10-23 08:57:08 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> An issue is that the gnupg update itself doesn't really qualify for
> stable-updates any more than it qualifies for
On 2018-10-21 12:48, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 11:21:36AM +, Georg Faerber wrote:
Hi,
On 18-10-21 12:05:31, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> That's all bugfixes related to enabling Enigmail and nothing in their
> is itself security-related, so I think that's
Wow, thanks a lot for your awesome work on both enigmail and gnupg, dkg!
I agree that this should be rolled out to users soon.
The classic path of using "stretch-proposed-updates" means that it would
land in the next point release (9.6). However, an ETA of that is "not
yet planned", according
Hi,
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 11:21:36AM +, Georg Faerber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 18-10-21 12:05:31, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> > That's all bugfixes related to enabling Enigmail and nothing in their
> > is itself security-related, so I think that's something for the point
> > update, not
Hi,
On 18-10-21 12:05:31, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> That's all bugfixes related to enabling Enigmail and nothing in their
> is itself security-related, so I think that's something for the point
> update, not security.debian.org
That's quite unfortunate to hear, and I don't share this opinion
On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 10:43:31AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-10-05 at 17:48 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> > I'd like to update the version of GnuPG in debian stable with a
> > series of targeted bugfixes (most of which are backported from
> > upstream).
> [...]
> > I note
On Fri, 2018-10-05 at 17:48 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> I'd like to update the version of GnuPG in debian stable with a
> series of targeted bugfixes (most of which are backported from
> upstream).
[...]
> I note that this is *not* itself a security fix -- these fixes do not
> address a
Hello,
again, thanks a lot to dkg for your hard work to bring Enigmail 2.0 to
Stretch! Once again it's amazing to follow your work and see how
thorough you are :)
On Sun, 14 Oct 2018 18:58:33 -0400 Daniel Kahn Gillmor
wrote:
> Hi release team, security team:
>
> over in #910398, i wrote:
>
>
Hi release team, security team:
over in #910398, i wrote:
On Fri 2018-10-05 17:48:10 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> I'd like to update the version of GnuPG in debian stable with a series
> of targeted bugfixes (most of which are backported from upstream).
>
> There are four complementary
On Thu 2018-10-11 13:02:18 +, Georg Faerber wrote:
> Although I'm not using Thunderbird and Enigmail myself, I've rolled out
> this fix to a couple of friends on Monday. So far, they're pretty happy,
> no problems found.
thanks for this testing and feedback, Georg!
--dkg
Hi dkg, all,
Thanks a lot for your hard work on this, highly appreciated.
On 18-10-05 17:48:10, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Testing
> ===
>
> I've tested these changes on an x86_64 system running debian stretch.
> The GnuPG test suite all passes, and an updated/backported version of
>
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-gnupg-ma...@lists.alioth.debian.org, secur...@debian.org
Usertags: pu
Tags: stretch
Severity: normal
Control: affects -1 src:gnupg2 enigmail
Control: block 909000 -1
I'd like to update the version of GnuPG
22 matches
Mail list logo
