reassign 914729 pycorrfit
retitle 914729 document does not compile: load order of packages needs to be
inverted
thanks
Hi Adrian, hi Hilmar,
as discussed, this is something that no LaTeX package can care for, and
authors need to ensure proper loading order.
If this has changed, then the
On Mon, 26 Nov 2018, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
> @Norbert: do you agree here?
Completely
Order of package loading is important and documents need adjustments
with new versions of support packages, as in this case.
This has always been like this, and there is unfortunately no way around
it (at least
On 26.11.18 22:45, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 10:38:24PM +0100, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
Hi Adrian,
>> but w/
>> options by default. AFAICT this example is not the only one where the
>> load order of the packages does matter.
>
> My LaTeX knowledge is extremely rusty.
>
> Is
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 10:38:24PM +0100, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
> On 26.11.18 19:53, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> Hi Adrian,
Hi Hilmar,
> > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=pycorrfit=sid
> >
> > This FTBFS in pycorrfit boils down to the following regression:
> >
> > $ cat test.tex
> >
On 26.11.18 19:53, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Hi Adrian,
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=pycorrfit=sid
>
> This FTBFS in pycorrfit boils down to the following regression:
>
> $ cat test.tex
> \documentclass{article}
> \usepackage{fancyvrb}
> \usepackage[svgnames]{xcolor}
>
Package: texlive-latex-recommended
Version: 2018.20181106-1
Severity: serious
Control: affects -1 src:pycorrfit
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=pycorrfit=sid
This FTBFS in pycorrfit boils down to the following regression:
$ cat test.tex
\documentclass{article}
6 matches
Mail list logo
