Bug#919619: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#919619: NM 1.24.0 now has basic support for hidden networks with iwd backend

2020-07-12 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Andreas Henriksson (2020-07-12 18:40:57) > On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 05:39:19PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > I understand that neither you nor Andreas consider current release of > > IWD a _recommended_ alternative for wpa-supplicant. That is a good > > reason to not depend on or

Bug#919619: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#919619: NM 1.24.0 now has basic support for hidden networks with iwd backend

2020-07-12 Thread Andreas Henriksson
Hello, On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 05:39:19PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > I understand that neither you nor Andreas consider current release of > IWD a _recommended_ alternative for wpa-supplicant. That is a good > reason to not depend on or recommend iwd. I think iwd itself (since >= 1.2,

Bug#919619: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#919619: NM 1.24.0 now has basic support for hidden networks with iwd backend

2020-07-12 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Michael Biebl (2020-07-04 00:42:57) > Am 04.07.20 um 00:16 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard: > > Then how about _not_ recommend iwd but just lower from depending on > > wpasupplicant to only recommending it. Because that's what it is: > > Recommended for all except special situations. For

Bug#919619: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#919619: NM 1.24.0 now has basic support for hidden networks with iwd backend

2020-07-03 Thread Andreas Henriksson
On Sat, Jul 04, 2020 at 12:42:57AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > Am 04.07.20 um 00:16 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard: > > Then how about _not_ recommend iwd but just lower from depending on > > wpasupplicant to only recommending it. Because that's what it is: > > Recommended for all except special

Bug#919619: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#919619: NM 1.24.0 now has basic support for hidden networks with iwd backend

2020-07-03 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 04.07.20 um 00:16 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard: > Then how about _not_ recommend iwd but just lower from depending on > wpasupplicant to only recommending it. Because that's what it is: > Recommended for all except special situations. For now... Right? Hm, no. That's exactly the situation I

Bug#919619: NM 1.24.0 now has basic support for hidden networks with iwd backend

2020-07-03 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Michael Biebl (2020-07-03 21:50:36) > Hi, > > On Tue, 26 May 2020 13:10:27 +0200 Andreas Henriksson > wrote: > > Just wanted to drop a comment about the iwd status in NM. > > NM has since 1.24.0, which is now in testing/unstable, basic > > support for connecting to a hidden network using

Bug#919619: NM 1.24.0 now has basic support for hidden networks with iwd backend

2020-07-03 Thread Michael Biebl
Hi, On Tue, 26 May 2020 13:10:27 +0200 Andreas Henriksson wrote: > Just wanted to drop a comment about the iwd status in NM. > NM has since 1.24.0, which is now in testing/unstable, basic > support for connecting to a hidden network using the iwd backend. > > There are still many minor bugs

Bug#919619: NM 1.24.0 now has basic support for hidden networks with iwd backend

2020-05-26 Thread Andreas Henriksson
Hi, Just wanted to drop a comment about the iwd status in NM. NM has since 1.24.0, which is now in testing/unstable, basic support for connecting to a hidden network using the iwd backend. There are still many minor bugs remaining in the NM iwd backend both for hidden and any other network.