On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 07:29:12PM +0100, Gert Wollny wrote:
> the problem is I at least don't know the offending package because I
> was not able to reproduce the build failure. Whatever it was, it has
> probably already benn fixed.
My build history for buster:
Status: successful
On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 02:21:25PM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Odd gdcm arch-indep does not FTBFS from buildd:
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gdcm=all=2.8.8-7=1552044907=0
Sorry, there were actually two different bugs here, one in buster (LaTeX
related)
and another
Control: severity -1 important
On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 8:24 AM Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 1:21 AM Santiago Vila wrote:
> > make[2]: *** [Makefile:6: refman.pdf] Error 1
>
> That must be a regression in one of the tex (sid) packages. I can
> build the pdf documentation
I can't reproduce this in current sid. I've did a new upload with a
minior unrelated fix incorporated by Gianfranco. If this passed on the
build servers, I'm going to close the bug,
best,
Gert
On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 1:21 AM Santiago Vila wrote:
> make[2]: *** [Makefile:6: refman.pdf] Error 1
That must be a regression in one of the tex (sid) packages. I can
build the pdf documentation just fine from my jessie Debian system:
Package: src:gdcm
Version: 2.8.8-6
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package in buster but it failed:
[...]
debian/rules binary-indep
dh binary-indep --with cli --with python3
6 matches
Mail list logo
