On Mon, 15 Jul 2019, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> On 2019-07-13 2:25 a.m., Finn Thain wrote:
> >
> > Michel, since this is fbdev not mach64, the bug you found cannot have
> > caused this. Is this problem confined to powerpc or does it also
> > appear in other Xorg regression tests?
>
> I don't
On 2019-07-13 2:25 a.m., Finn Thain wrote:
>
> Michel, since this is fbdev not mach64, the bug you found cannot have
> caused this. Is this problem confined to powerpc or does it also appear in
> other Xorg regression tests?
I don't know, but I don't think it matters too much; the goal should
On Fri, 12 Jul 2019, user...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > Please see attached "all.tar.xz", which contains the following files:
> >
> > "x11perf -all" tests:
> >
> > 1) x11perf_8_fbdev.txt: Debian 8.11, mach64 removed
> > 2) x11perf_8_mach64.txt : Debian 8.11, mach64 installed
> > 3)
On 7/11/19 10:49 AM, user...@yahoo.com wrote:
> On 7/4/19 1:07 PM, user...@yahoo.com wrote:
>> Correction: The CPU of the Wallstreet is 266 MHz, not 292 MHz.
>
> Update:
>
> Please see attached "all.tar.xz", which contains the following files:
>
> "x11perf -all" tests:
>
> 1)
On 2019-07-12 12:07 p.m., Finn Thain wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Jul 2019, Michel D?nzer wrote:
>> On 2019-07-11 6:49 p.m., user...@yahoo.com wrote:
>>>
>>> b) I was not able to install Michel's patch -- I wasn't sure what
>>> compile or other options to use. It looks like I could build a new
>>>
On Fri, 12 Jul 2019, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> On 2019-07-11 6:49 p.m., user...@yahoo.com wrote:
> >
> > b) I was not able to install Michel's patch -- I wasn't sure what
> > compile or other options to use. It looks like I could build a new
> > kernel with that (patched) module; would that be
On Thu, 11 Jul 2019, user...@yahoo.com wrote:
> On 7/11/19 8:15 PM, Finn Thain wrote:
> > On Thu, 11 Jul 2019, user...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > ...
> >>
> >> Shadowfb has no effect for mach64.
> >
> > I haven't seen any results that confirm this. Your results seem to
> > show that the xorg.conf
On 2019-07-11 6:49 p.m., user...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> b) I was not able to install Michel's patch -- I wasn't sure what
> compile or other options to use. It looks like I could build a new
> kernel with that (patched) module; would that be the best way to include
> the patch? I see that a
On 7/11/19 8:15 PM, Finn Thain wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Jul 2019, user...@yahoo.com wrote:
> ...
>>
>> Shadowfb has no effect for mach64.
>
> I haven't seen any results that confirm this. Your results seem to show
> that the xorg.conf change was bogus.
>
> Moreover, the X server logs show that the
On Thu, 11 Jul 2019, user...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> No, for all the tests today, I used 4.19.56-debian-pmac, with the same
> kernel command line (except for root=).
>
Right. My mistake.
> > > d) It takes approximately three seconds to open an xfce4-terminal in
> > > Debian 8.11, six seconds in
On 7/11/19 6:57 PM, Finn Thain wrote:
>
> On Thu, 11 Jul 2019, user...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
>> 8) Xorg_sid_fbdev.log: Xorg log file for test (3)
>> 9) Xorg_sid_mach64.log : Xorg log file for test (4)
>
> Thanks for sending these results.
>
> Unfortunately these SID test results might be
On Thu, 11 Jul 2019, user...@yahoo.com wrote:
> 8) Xorg_sid_fbdev.log: Xorg log file for test (3)
> 9) Xorg_sid_mach64.log : Xorg log file for test (4)
Thanks for sending these results.
Unfortunately these SID test results might be skewed because the X server
is continually logging
On 7/4/19 1:07 PM, user...@yahoo.com wrote:
> Correction: The CPU of the Wallstreet is 266 MHz, not 292 MHz.
Update:
Please see attached "all.tar.xz", which contains the following files:
"x11perf -all" tests:
1) x11perf_8_fbdev.txt: Debian 8.11, mach64 removed
2) x11perf_8_mach64.txt :
13 matches
Mail list logo
