Bug#933217: RM: check-mk -- RoQA, RC-Buggy, unmaintained, no reverse dependency

2019-10-08 Thread Matt Taggart
On 10/8/19 2:06 PM, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 09:34:46AM -0700, Matt Taggart wrote: >> Hi, >> >> >> I think it's fine for check-mk to be removed from unstable, if it does >> end up in Debian again it will be repackaged and should go through NEW >> again anyway. > > Ack,

Bug#933217: RM: check-mk -- RoQA, RC-Buggy, unmaintained, no reverse dependency

2019-10-08 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 09:34:46AM -0700, Matt Taggart wrote: > Hi, > > > I think it's fine for check-mk to be removed from unstable, if it does > end up in Debian again it will be repackaged and should go through NEW > again anyway. Ack, I've just filed a removal bug. I suppose the version

Bug#933217: RM: check-mk -- RoQA, RC-Buggy, unmaintained, no reverse dependency

2019-09-30 Thread Matt Taggart
Hi, Thanks for opening this bug, this should have been discussed a while ago. check-mk in debian was originally packaged and uploaded for Debian when it was a pretty basic nagios add-on. Since then upstream has both continued to add features and automation layers above that basic functionality

Bug#933217: RM: check-mk -- RoQA, RC-Buggy, unmaintained, no reverse dependency

2019-07-27 Thread Tobias Frost
Source: check-mk Severity: serious Justification: QA/MIA-Team Dear maintainers of check-mk, check-mk is currently RC-Buggy with 2 RC bugs: #876686 [S| | ] [check-mk-config-icinga] check-mk-config-icinga: file conflict with check-mk-common: /usr/share/check_mk/cmk/paths.py #924727 [S|