Bug#934630: transition: octave

2019-10-09 Thread Sébastien Villemot
Le mardi 08 octobre 2019 à 20:40 +0200, Paul Gevers a écrit : > On 08-10-2019 14:07, Sébastien Villemot wrote: > > All packages concerned by this transition are now fixed, the only > > exception being octave-mpi. For the latter, I suggest that it be > > removed from testing, because the fix is not

Bug#934630: transition: octave

2019-10-08 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Sébastien, On 08-10-2019 14:07, Sébastien Villemot wrote: > All packages concerned by this transition are now fixed, the only > exception being octave-mpi. For the latter, I suggest that it be > removed from testing, because the fix is not obvious, and upstream has > to be involved. I'll hint

Bug#934630: transition: octave

2019-10-08 Thread Sébastien Villemot
Le jeudi 03 octobre 2019 à 21:35 +0200, Sébastien Villemot a écrit : > Le jeudi 03 octobre 2019 à 09:14 +0200, Paul Gevers a écrit : > > > Octave has now been built everywhere. Will you take care of all the > > failures in the reverse build depends? There are 16 packages that need > > your

Bug#934630: transition: octave

2019-10-03 Thread Sébastien Villemot
Le jeudi 03 octobre 2019 à 09:14 +0200, Paul Gevers a écrit : > Octave has now been built everywhere. Will you take care of all the > failures in the reverse build depends? There are 16 packages that need > your attention before octave can migrate. I filed one FTBFS bug already, > but waiting for

Bug#934630: transition: octave

2019-10-03 Thread Paul Gevers
Control: block 934630 by 919641 Hi Sébastien, On 02-10-2019 10:30, Sébastien Villemot wrote: > However this time it failed to build on all arches, because of texinfo > 6.7.0.dfsg.2-2 which was buggy. Since then, texinfo 6.7.0.dfsg.2-3 has > been uploaded which should fix that. Can you please

Bug#934630: transition: octave

2019-10-02 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 02/10/2019 10:30, Sébastien Villemot wrote: > Le mardi 01 octobre 2019 à 20:34 +0200, Paul Gevers a écrit : >> On 01-10-2019 17:35, Sébastien Villemot wrote: >>> It failed to build for a 3rd time. So the problem is not transient, and >>> I could reproduce it on the porterbox. > > […] > >>>

Bug#934630: transition: octave

2019-10-02 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 01/10/2019 20:34, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi Sébastien, > > On 01-10-2019 17:35, Sébastien Villemot wrote: >> It failed to build for a 3rd time. So the problem is not transient, and >> I could reproduce it on the porterbox. >> >> For a given C++ source file, the generated assembly file is 303Mb

Bug#934630: transition: octave

2019-10-02 Thread Sébastien Villemot
Le mardi 01 octobre 2019 à 20:34 +0200, Paul Gevers a écrit : > On 01-10-2019 17:35, Sébastien Villemot wrote: > > It failed to build for a 3rd time. So the problem is not transient, and > > I could reproduce it on the porterbox. […] > > I’m tempted to drop -g for that particular file and

Bug#934630: transition: octave

2019-10-01 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Sébastien, On 01-10-2019 17:35, Sébastien Villemot wrote: > It failed to build for a 3rd time. So the problem is not transient, and > I could reproduce it on the porterbox. > > For a given C++ source file, the generated assembly file is 303Mb > large. Then the assembler hits the virtual space

Bug#934630: transition: octave

2019-10-01 Thread Sébastien Villemot
Le lundi 30 septembre 2019 à 20:45 +0200, Paul Gevers a écrit : > On 30-09-2019 13:43, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > On 30/09/2019 11:56, Sébastien Villemot wrote: > > > The new version (5.1.0-2) is now uploaded and built on all release > > > architectures, except on mipsel. The build failure

Bug#934630: transition: octave

2019-09-30 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Sébastien, On 30-09-2019 13:43, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 30/09/2019 11:56, Sébastien Villemot wrote: >> Hi Paul, >> >> Le dimanche 29 septembre 2019 à 21:57 +0200, Paul Gevers a écrit : >>> On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 17:53:33 +0200 =?utf-8?q?S=C3=A9bastien_Villemot?= >>> wrote:

Bug#934630: transition: octave

2019-09-30 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 30/09/2019 11:56, Sébastien Villemot wrote: > Hi Paul, > > Le dimanche 29 septembre 2019 à 21:57 +0200, Paul Gevers a écrit : >> On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 17:53:33 +0200 =?utf-8?q?S=C3=A9bastien_Villemot?= >> wrote: >>> Please schedule a transition for octave 5. >>> >>> Most reverse dependencies

Bug#934630: transition: octave

2019-09-30 Thread Sébastien Villemot
Hi Paul, Le dimanche 29 septembre 2019 à 21:57 +0200, Paul Gevers a écrit : > On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 17:53:33 +0200 =?utf-8?q?S=C3=A9bastien_Villemot?= > wrote: > > Please schedule a transition for octave 5. > > > > Most reverse dependencies have already been updated by the Debian Octave > >

Bug#934630: transition: octave

2019-09-29 Thread Paul Gevers
Control: tags -1 confirmed Hi Sébastien, On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 17:53:33 +0200 =?utf-8?q?S=C3=A9bastien_Villemot?= wrote: > Please schedule a transition for octave 5. > > Most reverse dependencies have already been updated by the Debian Octave Group > and should therefore be compatible with the

Bug#934630: transition: octave

2019-08-12 Thread Sébastien Villemot
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-octave.html Dear Release Team, Please schedule a transition for octave 5. Most reverse dependencies have already