On Mon, 11 May 2020, Markus Koschany wrote:
Anyway, I pushed a change to allow resizing that window so that should
at least help.
Thank you very much! That solved the problem. I have just uploaded
playonlinux with your patch to unstable.
Great! Feel free to ping me if any bugs related to
Am 10.05.20 um 18:30 schrieb Scott Talbert:
[...]
>> Okay. I think the problem is that the UI layout is somewhat
>> statically defined and it does not leave enough room for the German(?)
>> translations. Let me see if I can figure out how to make that better.
>>
>> I did figure out how to make
On Sun, 10 May 2020, Scott Talbert wrote:
I'm attaching a screenshot. I thought it would be related to the Python
3 port but maybe it's just a playonlinux or wxpython bug with certain
Gnome themes? The two buttons "Abbrechen" (Cancel) and "Anwenden"
(Apply) should be either in the center or
On Sun, 10 May 2020, Markus Koschany wrote:
I'm attaching a screenshot. I thought it would be related to the Python
3 port but maybe it's just a playonlinux or wxpython bug with certain
Gnome themes? The two buttons "Abbrechen" (Cancel) and "Anwenden"
(Apply) should be either in the center or
I'm attaching a screenshot. I thought it would be related to the Python
3 port but maybe it's just a playonlinux or wxpython bug with certain
Gnome themes? The two buttons "Abbrechen" (Cancel) and "Anwenden"
(Apply) should be either in the center or correctly align to the right
side of the
On Sun, 10 May 2020, Markus Koschany wrote:
Thanks for all your work on porting playonlinux to Python 3. I have
tested the port for a while now. Compiling works as expected. After
installing the i386 Wine version I could install Internet Explorer 7 and
MTPaint. The only glitches I found are in
Hi Scott,
Am 07.05.20 um 17:19 schrieb Scott Talbert:
[...]
>> I haven't had the time to really review and test your patch but I will
>> do so eventually.
>
> Thanks. Let me know if you would like me to just NMU it as well.
Thanks for all your work on porting playonlinux to Python 3. I have
On Thu, 23 Apr 2020, Markus Koschany wrote:
OK, so it turns out the port to Python 3 was a bit harder than
expected, but I think I've got something ready for further review /
testing. I have done some initial testing, but I'm not that familiar
with playonlinux so I would appreciate some
Hi Scott,
Am 23.04.20 um 17:21 schrieb Scott Talbert:
> On Wed, 15 Apr 2020, Scott Talbert wrote:
>
>> OK, so it turns out the port to Python 3 was a bit harder than
>> expected, but I think I've got something ready for further review /
>> testing. I have done some initial testing, but I'm not
On Wed, 15 Apr 2020, Scott Talbert wrote:
OK, so it turns out the port to Python 3 was a bit harder than expected, but
I think I've got something ready for further review / testing. I have done
some initial testing, but I'm not that familiar with playonlinux so I would
appreciate some
On Wed, 8 Apr 2020, Markus Koschany wrote:
So, I took an initial look at trying to package Phoenicis, but it looks
like a rather large task (ie, lots of missing dependencies).
On the other hand, I looked at the Python code, and at first glance, it
doesn't look like it would be *that* difficult
Am 08.04.20 um 16:20 schrieb Scott Talbert:
[...]
> So, I took an initial look at trying to package Phoenicis, but it looks
> like a rather large task (ie, lots of missing dependencies).
>
> On the other hand, I looked at the Python code, and at first glance, it
> doesn't look like it would be
On Tue, 3 Mar 2020, Scott Talbert wrote:
Sorry, I do not mean any disrespect. What can I do to help?
I believe the best thing to do would be to package the new Java version.
https://github.com/PhoenicisOrg/phoenicis
This requires some knowledge of Java and how Java applications are
On Tue, 3 Mar 2020, Markus Koschany wrote:
Sorry, I do not mean any disrespect. What can I do to help?
I believe the best thing to do would be to package the new Java version.
https://github.com/PhoenicisOrg/phoenicis
This requires some knowledge of Java and how Java applications are
Am 03.03.20 um 01:54 schrieb Scott Talbert:
[...]
> Sorry, I do not mean any disrespect. What can I do to help?
I believe the best thing to do would be to package the new Java version.
https://github.com/PhoenicisOrg/phoenicis
This requires some knowledge of Java and how Java applications
On Tue, 3 Mar 2020, Markus Koschany wrote:
Because it is preventing Python 2 removal work. Python 2 removal is a
long process, involving nearly 3500 packages [1]. It is not happening
in one instant, but gradually over time. At the moment, playonlinux is
a leaf package from a Python 2
Am 02.03.20 um 23:46 schrieb Scott Talbert:
[...]
> Because it is preventing Python 2 removal work. Python 2 removal is a
> long process, involving nearly 3500 packages [1]. It is not happening
> in one instant, but gradually over time. At the moment, playonlinux is
> a leaf package from a
On Mon, 2 Mar 2020, Markus Koschany wrote:
What is the games team plan for Python 3 support in playonlinux? Do
you plan to port it to Python 3? Or remove?
I don't plan to port playonlinux to Python 3. However, a new version
of playonlinux is currently developped under Java [1]. There is no
Am 02.03.20 um 03:03 schrieb Scott Talbert:
> On Sat, 29 Feb 2020, Bertrand Marc wrote:
>
>>> On Thu, 30 Jan 2020, Scott Talbert wrote:
What is the games team plan for Python 3 support in playonlinux? Do
you plan to port it to Python 3? Or remove?
>>
>> I don't plan to port
On Sat, 29 Feb 2020, Bertrand Marc wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jan 2020, Scott Talbert wrote:
What is the games team plan for Python 3 support in playonlinux? Do you plan
to port it to Python 3? Or remove?
I don't plan to port playonlinux to Python 3. However, a new version of
playonlinux is
Hi Scott,
> On Thu, 30 Jan 2020, Scott Talbert wrote:
>>
>> What is the games team plan for Python 3 support in playonlinux? Do you
>> plan to port it to Python 3? Or remove?
I don't plan to port playonlinux to Python 3. However, a new version of
playonlinux is currently developped under
On Thu, 30 Jan 2020, Scott Talbert wrote:
Package: src:playonlinux
Version: 4.3.4-1
Severity: normal
Tags: sid bullseye
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: py2removal
Python2 becomes end-of-live upstream, and Debian aims to remove
Python2 from the distribution, as discussed in
On Fri, 30 Aug 2019, Matthias Klose wrote:
Package: src:playonlinux
Version: 4.3.4-1
Severity: normal
Tags: sid bullseye
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: py2removal
Python2 becomes end-of-live upstream, and Debian aims to remove
Python2 from the distribution, as discussed in
23 matches
Mail list logo
