On 2019-09-08 22:23, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>
> Hi Aurelien,
>
> Let's have this going.
Ok, I have just uploaded it.
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
signature.asc
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Hi Aurelien,
Let's have this going.
Paul
@ginggs, I don't mind if you beat me to the binNMU's ;)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 2019-09-04 21:08, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Aurelien,
>
> On 02-09-2019 21:43, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >>> - nemo: seems to be a bug in udisks2 postinst script
> >>> - pg-repack: debci issue, the regression is caused by libpq5 from
> >>> experimental, which is wrongly selected
Hi,
On 2019-09-05 13:30, Ole Streicher wrote:
> Package: sextractor
> Version: 2.19.5+dfsg-6
>
>
> Hi Paul, Aurelien,
>
> I maintain both packages (sextractor and iraf-fitsutil).
>
> 1st, quick answer for sextractor: You don't need to care; this is my
> fault/problem: The test is home-made
Package: sextractor
Version: 2.19.5+dfsg-6
Hi Paul, Aurelien,
I maintain both packages (sextractor and iraf-fitsutil).
1st, quick answer for sextractor: You don't need to care; this is my
fault/problem: The test is home-made and directly compares string-wise
the result with a reference
Hi maintainers of sextractor and iraf-fitsutil,
In bug 939048 we are discussing a transition slot for glibc 2.29. As
part of the preparation we are checking autopkgtest results in unstable,
when glibc 2.29 from experimental is installed. This e-mail is a heads
up of failures in your packages. Can
On 2019-09-04 21:08, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Aurelien,
>
> On 02-09-2019 21:43, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >>> - nemo: seems to be a bug in udisks2 postinst script
> >>> - pg-repack: debci issue, the regression is caused by libpq5 from
> >>> experimental, which is wrongly selected
Hi Aurelien,
On 02-09-2019 21:43, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
[...]
>>> - nemo: seems to be a bug in udisks2 postinst script
>>> - pg-repack: debci issue, the regression is caused by libpq5 from
>>> experimental, which is wrongly selected instead of the unstable
>>> version.
>>> - repmgr: ditto
On 31.08.19 16:12, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
- gcc-9
- gcc-snapshot
I'll take care of these with regular uploads.
Hi Paul,
On 2019-09-02 21:05, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Aurelien,
>
> On 01-09-2019 23:03, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> >> https://release.debian.org/britney/pseudo-excuses-experimental.html#glibc
> >
> > I picked up a few issues, and they were false positive:
>
> Thanks for doing so.
>
> > - dante:
Hi Aurelien,
On 01-09-2019 23:03, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> https://release.debian.org/britney/pseudo-excuses-experimental.html#glibc
>
> I picked up a few issues, and they were false positive:
Thanks for doing so.
> - dante: needs to be binNMUed against the new libc
You already identified
On 2019-09-01 22:00, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Aurelien,
>
> On 31-08-2019 18:37, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > On 31-08-2019 16:12, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> >> I would like to get a transition slot for glibc 2.29. It is available in
> >> experimental for a bit more than 2 weeks and there is no known issue
Hi Aurelien,
On 31-08-2019 18:37, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 31-08-2019 16:12, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> I would like to get a transition slot for glibc 2.29. It is available in
>> experimental for a bit more than 2 weeks and there is no known issue or
>> regression.
> I can have the
Hi,
On 31-08-2019 16:12, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> I would like to get a transition slot for glibc 2.29. It is available in
> experimental for a bit more than 2 weeks and there is no known issue or
> regression.
I can have the experimental-to-unstable pseudo britney run finish its
work for glibc
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Dear release team,
I would like to get a transition slot for glibc 2.29. It is available in
experimental for a bit more than 2 weeks and there is no known issue or
regression. It has
15 matches
Mail list logo
