Hi Mattia,
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 9:40 AM Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
>
> However, please do try to judge the proposals
Actually, I implement them so you and the community can judge.
Kind regards
Felix Lechner
Noted. Let's see what it'll yield.
However, please do try to judge the proposals, instead of very blindly
implement them. Arguing might be unproductive but, as I mentioned in the
past, generally annoying and likely inactionable tags are likewise very
unproductive for us! :)
On Mon, 22 Jun 2020,
Hi Mattia,
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 8:58 AM Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
>
> I don't think I have much voice here, but tbh I feel like this is totally
> artificially adding
> restraints that have no real reason to exist.
That sweeping statement does not cover either (1) the accidental
installation
I don't think I have much voice here, but tbh I feel like this is totally
artificially adding restraints that have no real reason to exist.
It's alright to think that at times this might be hiding a packaging error,
but honestly most of those case are usually self-evident and IME very
rarely are
Hi Chris,
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 7:57 AM Chris Lamb wrote:
>
> P: lintian: repeated-path-segment usr usr/share/lintian/checks/usr/lib.pm
Also solved by renaming, in commit 68b72cd0.
Kind regards
Felix Lechner
Felix Lechner wrote:
> > Up to you.
>
> In commit 1b9e1048, I went with option #2.
Thanks. As of f938c5480, we are still seeing it for:
P: lintian: repeated-path-segment usr usr/share/lintian/checks/usr/lib.pm
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'`
Hi Chris,
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 12:45 AM Chris Lamb wrote:
>
> Up to you.
In commit 1b9e1048, I went with option #2.
Kind regards
Felix Lechner
Hi Felix,
> As for the actual occurrence of the tag in Lintian, we have three options:
Up to you.
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
Hi Chris,
On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 7:15 AM Chris Lamb wrote:
>
> the
> severity level is too high.
I agree. The severity was reduced to pedantic.
As for the actual occurrence of the tag in Lintian, we have three options:
1. Install an override. This is my favorite. The tag was not triggered
by
Hi,
> please warn for files installed into /
This emits against Lintian itself:
W: lintian: repeated-path-segment lintian
usr/share/lintian/checks/lintian/override/
N:
N:The file is installed into a location that repeats the given path
N:segment. An example would be
Hi Matthias,
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 9:33 AM Matthias Klose wrote:
>
> seen at #950027, a packaging issue. I think it would be trivial to warn about
> installations into /, however I didn't check about any false
> positives.
I read the other bug. What should Lintian do, please?
Kind regards
Package: lintian
Severity: wishlist
seen at #950027, a packaging issue. I think it would be trivial to warn about
installations into /, however I didn't check about any false
positives.
12 matches
Mail list logo
