Bug#950990: neomutt: New upstream release (20191207)

2020-03-12 Thread Andreas Henriksson
Hello, On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 05:46:00PM -0700, Stefano Rivera wrote: [...] > Err, why don't you have the original repo? My original repo, where I did this work originally. As described in my original mail. Where some dude refered to having successfully built from (despite I never pushed

Bug#950990: neomutt: New upstream release (20191207)

2020-03-02 Thread Andreas Henriksson
Hello, On Sun, Feb 09, 2020 at 11:48:58AM +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > Package: neomutt > Version: 2019+dfsg.1-1 > Severity: wishlist > > Dear Maintainer, > > I've prepared an updated package for the new upstream release > (that fixes both of the open RC bugs) available at: >

Bug#950990: neomutt: New upstream release (20191207)

2020-02-28 Thread Joerg Dorchain
On Sun, 9 Feb 2020 11:48:58 +0100 Andreas Henriksson wrote: > > Dear Maintainer, > > I've prepared an updated package for the new upstream release > (that fixes both of the open RC bugs) available at: > https://salsa.debian.org/ah/neomutt > > Given that the neomutt package is soon about to be

Bug#950990: neomutt: New upstream release (20191207)

2020-02-09 Thread Andreas Henriksson
Package: neomutt Version: 2019+dfsg.1-1 Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, I've prepared an updated package for the new upstream release (that fixes both of the open RC bugs) available at: https://salsa.debian.org/ah/neomutt Given that the neomutt package is soon about to be removed from