Bug#951216: poppler-utils: pdfinfo incorrectly reports date metadata under reprotest

2020-02-19 Thread Jeff
Strangely, the dummy package built fine (i.e. only reproducibility problems, not build-chain problems) on a Mint 19.3-based machine, which allowed me to try out Vagrant's suggestions[1]: > This *should* vary only time: > reprotest --variations=-all,+time > and and only timezome: > reprotest

Bug#951216: poppler-utils: pdfinfo incorrectly reports date metadata under reprotest

2020-02-14 Thread Jeff
> Can I suggest two things at this point? First, could you attach your > generated test.pdf to this bug so that we are completely on the same > page and using the exactly the same file? Secondly, perhaps you could > systematically alter the settings of reprotest in order to identify > which is the

Bug#951216: poppler-utils: pdfinfo incorrectly reports date metadata under reprotest

2020-02-13 Thread Chris Lamb
user reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org usertag 951216 + toolchain timestamps thanks > poppler-utils: pdfinfo incorrectly reports date metadata under reprotest It's unclear to me whether this is a bug in Poppler or reprotest. When I try and reproduce this outside of reprotest, for

Bug#951216: poppler-utils: pdfinfo incorrectly reports date metadata under reprotest

2020-02-12 Thread Jeffrey Ratcliffe
Package: poppler-utils Version: 0.71.0-6 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? Create a PDF with defined date metadata: convert rose: test.tif && tiff2pdf -o test.pdf -e