On Sat, 15 Feb 2020 13:16:10 +0100 Christian Kastner wrote:
> On 15.02.20 11:39, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> > Is it wrong (or too late) to change that symbol into
> > keyctl_move@KEYUTILS_1.10 ?
> > Would that bump the SONAME again and generate libkeyutils.so.1.10 ?
>
> The SONAME didn't
On 15.02.20 11:39, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 23:15:08 +0100 Christian Kastner wrote:
> OK, I am about to say something very idiotic here, because I am not too
> familiar with versioned symbols in libraries. Hence, please bear with
> me...
>
> Is it wrong (or too late) to change
On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 23:15:08 +0100 Christian Kastner wrote:
[...]
> On 14.02.20 20:21, Axel Beckert wrote:
[...]
> > IMHO this is a bug in rkhunter, but it could also be solved in
> > keyutils by bumping the SONAME again, i.e. skipping this SONAME
> > version explicitly. But feel free to
On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 20:21:32 +0100 Axel Beckert wrote:
[...]
> Hi,
Hello Axel, thanks a lot for looking into my bug report!
>
> Francesco Poli (wintermute) wrote:
[...]
> > Does libkeyutils1/1.6.1-2 ship a rootkit?
>
> Likely not. I looked through the whole diff between 1.6 and 1.6.1. At
>
Hi Axel,
thank you for your effort in locating the cause of this!
On 14.02.20 20:21, Axel Beckert wrote:
> c459dfa4 (Francois Marier 2014-10-14 23:24:53 +1300 9958)
>\[pdflush\]:IRC bot
> eca1837f (Francois Marier 2017-07-01 20:33:17 -0700 9959)
>
Control: severity -1 normal
Hi,
Francesco Poli (wintermute) wrote:
> After upgrading
>
> [UPGRADE] libkeyutils1:amd64 1.6-6 -> 1.6.1-2
>
> I get the following warning with
>
> # rkhunter --sk -c
>
> in /var/log/rkhunter.log:
>
> Info: Starting test name 'running_procs'
> Checking
Package: libkeyutils1
Version: 1.6.1-2
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Hello!
After upgrading
[UPGRADE] libkeyutils1:amd64 1.6-6 -> 1.6.1-2
I get the following warning with
# rkhunter --sk -c
in /var/log/rkhunter.log:
Info: Starting test name
7 matches
Mail list logo
