Hi Brian,
Sorry for the late reply.
On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 10:56 PM Brian Thompson wrote:
> On Mon, 2021-08-16 at 21:27 -0600, Anthony Fok wrote:
> >
> > Now, you might run into a problem when actually trying to name the
> > package "github-cli" (or even "gh") because dh-make-golang 0.4.0 does
On 2021-08-18 05:33:30, Anthony Fok wrote:
> Hi Antoine,
>
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 7:40 AM Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>>
>> On 2021-08-16 21:27:33, Anthony Fok wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> > So, in summary, it just means the following in debian/control:
>> >
>> > Source: github-cli
>> > ...
>>
Hi Antoine,
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 7:40 AM Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>
> On 2021-08-16 21:27:33, Anthony Fok wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > So, in summary, it just means the following in debian/control:
> >
> > Source: github-cli
> > ...
> > XS-Go-Import-Path: github.com/github/cli
> > ...
On 2021-08-16 21:27:33, Anthony Fok wrote:
[...]
> So, in summary, it just means the following in debian/control:
>
> Source: github-cli
> ...
> XS-Go-Import-Path: github.com/github/cli
> ...
> Package: github-cli
> ...
> Conflicts: gitsome, gh
> Provides: gh
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Mon, 2021-08-16 at 21:27 -0600, Anthony Fok wrote:
> NEW queueOn Sun, Aug 15, 2021 at 10:45 PM Brian Thompson
> wrote:
> >
> > Since there is already a package that uses that binary name, who should
> > change it? Do we follow a first-come
NEW queueOn Sun, Aug 15, 2021 at 10:45 PM Brian Thompson
wrote:
* * >
> On Sat, 14 Aug 2021 14:18:34 -0400 Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> >
> > It's not on the package name, but there's already a clash on the
> > binary name, which we should be mindful of:
> > gitsome provides direct integration
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Sat, 14 Aug 2021 14:18:34 -0400 =?utf-8?Q?Antoine_Beaupr=C3=A9?= <
anar...@orangeseeds.org> wrote:
>
> It's not on the package name, but there's already a clash on the
binary
> name, which we should be mindful of:
> gitsome provides direct
On 0814, Paul Wise wrote:
>
>Could also add a Provides: gh so it is installable with the short name.
>
>I would definitely like to have this in Debian, but can't help with it.
>
This would be ideal. Is there any benefit of renaming the package to
something other than "gh"? I can help with this
On 2021-08-08 10:17:06, Brian Thompson wrote:
>> I personally find that "gh" is quite short name for a package that
>> will go into a general purpose software catalog like Debian repository. Would
>> you mind choosing something like "github-cli" as source and binary
>> package name and mentioning
On Sun, 8 Aug 2021 10:17:06 -0500 Brian Thompson wrote:
> I like that proposal and think it makes a lot of sense. `gh` does seem
> too short, and while easy to identify for current gh users, maybe it
> will be more difficult to find in apt for new users. Also, as you
> mentioned, a namespace
> I personally find that "gh" is quite short name for a package that
> will go into a general purpose software catalog like Debian repository. Would
> you mind choosing something like "github-cli" as source and binary
> package name and mentioning the sortcut "gh" in a package description?
> So
Hello!
I personally find that "gh" is quite short name for a package that will
go into a general purpose software catalog like Debian repository. Would
you mind choosing something like "github-cli" as source and binary
package name and mentioning the sortcut "gh" in a package description?
So
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: gh
Version : 0.5.5
Upstream Author : GitHub Inc.
* URL : https://cli.github.com/
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Go
Description : the GitHub CLI
`gh` is
13 matches
Mail list logo
