Thank you for the feedback.
> Do we need both packages in Debian? If, as you say, spamass-milter is
> orphaned upstream, maybe we should work to replace it with this new
> package? I'm not sure how our users benefit from having both, and the
> choice will undoubtedly lead to confusion.
I don’t
On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 11:00:45AM +0100, David Bürgin wrote:
> Debian already has package spamass-milter, which serves the same
> function. This new alternative is not exactly the same: It does a few
> things better (eg automatic macro negotiation, skipping large bodies),
> some things
Package: wnpp
Owner: David Bürgin
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: spamassassin-milter
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : David Bürgin
* URL : https://gitlab.com/glts/spamassassin-milter
* License : GPL-3.0-or-later
Programming Lang: Rust
Description
3 matches
Mail list logo
