Bug#953851: pymissile: should this package be removed?

2020-03-21 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 02:15:00PM -0400, Sandro Tosi wrote: > > While these are all good arguments for removal, I still got the hardware > > and thus enjoy having the software to use it in Debian. :) > > > > But I realise that it need some porting to keep working, and lack the > > spare time

Bug#953851: pymissile: should this package be removed?

2020-03-15 Thread Sandro Tosi
> While these are all good arguments for removal, I still got the hardware > and thus enjoy having the software to use it in Debian. :) > > But I realise that it need some porting to keep working, and lack the > spare time required to do it myself. :( are you ok with removing this package now,

Bug#953851: pymissile: should this package be removed?

2020-03-15 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Sandro Tosi] > if i dont hear back within a week with a good reason to keep this > package, i'll file for its removal. While these are all good arguments for removal, I still got the hardware and thus enjoy having the software to use it in Debian. :) But I realise that it need some porting to

Bug#953851: pymissile: should this package be removed?

2020-03-13 Thread Sandro Tosi
Package: pymissile Severity: serious Hello, i believe this package should be removed: * python2-only * dead upstream, no new releases since 2007 (!) * no debian uploads since 2016 * last reverse dependency of python-usb (py2removal effort) if i dont hear back within a week with a good reason to