On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 6:35 PM Felix Lechner
wrote:
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 3:26 PM Chris Lawrence wrote:
> >
> > I just reassigned the bug to my package and am preparing to upload a
> > fix. Sorry for troubling you!
>
> Please do not worry. We are happy to help!
>
> I am
Hi Chris,
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 3:26 PM Chris Lawrence wrote:
>
> I just reassigned the bug to my package and am preparing to upload a
> fix. Sorry for troubling you!
Please do not worry. We are happy to help!
I am thinking about renaming the tag to 'generated-content'. Would
that be a
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 9:12 PM Felix Lechner
wrote:
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 2:33 PM Chris Lawrence wrote:
> >
> > The latex2rtf binary is built by a Makefile, without a source file
> > specifically called latex2rtf.c
> >
> > it's a false positive
>
> That's not possible (or
Hi Chris,
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 2:33 PM Chris Lawrence wrote:
>
> The latex2rtf binary is built by a Makefile, without a source file
> specifically called latex2rtf.c
>
> it's a false positive
That's not possible (or there is a misunderstanding). The tag
source-is-missing operates on source
Package: lintian
Version: 2.80.0
Severity: normal
The latex2rtf binary is built by a Makefile, without a source file
specifically called latex2rtf.c (etc.), by linking a bunch of other
files. I'm not sure if this is a result of the weird Makefile that is
designed to allow the binary to be built
5 matches
Mail list logo
