Bug#964073: lintian: Possible false positives for breakout-link for Lua modules

2020-07-02 Thread Sergei Golovan
Hi Felix, On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 2:22 AM Felix Lechner wrote: > > Hi Sergei, > > On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 1:33 AM Sergei Golovan wrote: > > > > Though, the link never goes outside /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu, > > so I would say that this warning is spurious. > > I am not sure who is right, but the

Bug#964073: lintian: Possible false positives for breakout-link for Lua modules

2020-07-01 Thread Felix Lechner
Hi Russ, On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 9:55 PM Russ Allbery wrote: > > I'm not active and don't want to second-guess how > you're handling things. Thank you for writing that. I have likewise been reluctant to comment on the good work of past maintainers. > But I guess I'll say here that I think the

Bug#964073: lintian: Possible false positives for breakout-link for Lua modules

2020-07-01 Thread Russ Allbery
Felix Lechner writes: > On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 8:16 PM Russ Allbery wrote: >> I'm puzzled by why you would have changed Lintian in response to that >> bug, given that the reported problem was only with Lintian and was >> fixed sixteen years ago. > I am just working through open bugs. I didn't

Bug#964073: lintian: Possible false positives for breakout-link for Lua modules

2020-07-01 Thread Felix Lechner
Hi Russ, On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 8:16 PM Russ Allbery wrote: > > I'm puzzled by why you would have changed Lintian in response to that bug, > given that the reported problem was only with Lintian and was fixed > sixteen years ago. I am just working through open bugs. Why did you not voice your

Bug#964073: lintian: Possible false positives for breakout-link for Lua modules

2020-07-01 Thread Russ Allbery
Felix Lechner writes: > On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 1:33 AM Sergei Golovan wrote: >> Though, the link never goes outside /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu, >> so I would say that this warning is spurious. > I am not sure who is right, but the warning is not spurious from the > perspective of the original

Bug#964073: lintian: Possible false positives for breakout-link for Lua modules

2020-07-01 Thread Felix Lechner
Hi Sergei, On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 1:33 AM Sergei Golovan wrote: > > Though, the link never goes outside /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu, > so I would say that this warning is spurious. I am not sure who is right, but the warning is not spurious from the perspective of the original requestor.

Bug#964073: lintian: Possible false positives for breakout-link for Lua modules

2020-07-01 Thread Chris Lamb
Hi Sergei, > Since it points to a higher location in the file system, lintian shows a > warning. Though, the link never goes outside /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu, > so I would say that this warning is spurious. Thanks for your report and it sounds like you are right. (Mostly replying so you don't

Bug#964073: lintian: Possible false positives for breakout-link for Lua modules

2020-07-01 Thread Sergei Golovan
Package: lintian Version: 2.82.0 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, Recently, lintian started to emit the breakout-link warning for a bunch of Lua related packages. A typical structure of a Lua package with a C library is the following: The C library with a symlink (to allow someone to link a