On Mon, 17 Aug 2020 at 18:44:58 +0200, Jann Haber wrote:
> Wouldn't the easiest fix for this bug and also #937062, #966763 and
> #967043 be to just drop the binary package libapache2-mod-wsgi and only
> keeping the py3 version around?
>
> There seem to be no more rdeps in testing, so no other
Wouldn't the easiest fix for this bug and also #937062, #966763 and #967043 be
to just drop the binary package libapache2-mod-wsgi and only keeping the py3
version around?
There seem to be no more rdeps in testing, so no other packages are blocking
the removal (right?). This would help the
Hi,
The package needs some more work.
I plan work on it this week, I hope have some news
in the next few days.
Cheers,
Arias Emmanuel
@eamanu
http://eamanu.com
El mar., 11 de ago. de 2020 a la(s) 12:15, nb (n...@dagami.org) escribió:
>
> How much time does it take to come to sid?
>
>
Hi,
That problem seems to be fixed on salsa, but I am
waiting for a review.
Cheers,
Arias Emmanuel
@eamanu
http://eamanu.com
El sáb., 8 de ago. de 2020 a la(s) 04:15, greylistd Python issue
(n...@dagami.org) escribió:
>
> Package: libapache2-mod-wsgi
> Version: 4.6.8-1+b1
> Severity: grave
>
4 matches
Mail list logo
