Bug#972114: sympa: CVE-2020-26880

2021-01-05 Thread Sylvain Beucler
Hi, Following user questions, here's my understanding of the current situation: - The issue is partially fixed in Debian by optionally not setting the setuid permissions (debconf question), and setting 'aliases_program' to a method that does not require root (postmap/postalias for Postfix,

Bug#972114: sympa: CVE-2020-26880

2020-11-07 Thread Sylvain Beucler
Hi Stefan, On 05/11/2020 15:29, Stefan Hornburg (Racke) wrote: On 11/5/20 3:19 PM, Sylvain Beucler wrote: @racke, following your work at https://github.com/sympa-community/sympa/pull/1015 it seems we'd need a new debconf question to ask the user whether they want the setuid wrapper to be

Bug#972114: sympa: CVE-2020-26880

2020-11-05 Thread Stefan Hornburg (Racke)
On 11/5/20 3:19 PM, Sylvain Beucler wrote: > Hi, > > @racke, following your work at > https://github.com/sympa-community/sympa/pull/1015 > it seems we'd need a new debconf question to ask the user whether they want > the setuid wrapper to be activated or not. > Yes, good idea. But it would

Bug#972114: sympa: CVE-2020-26880

2020-11-05 Thread Sylvain Beucler
Hi, @racke, following your work at https://github.com/sympa-community/sympa/pull/1015 it seems we'd need a new debconf question to ask the user whether they want the setuid wrapper to be activated or not. This could be added even before the pull request merged I think, as toggling the setuid

Bug#972114: sympa: CVE-2020-26880

2020-10-12 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Source: sympa Version: 6.2.40~dfsg-7 Severity: important Tags: security upstream Forwarded: https://github.com/sympa-community/sympa/issues/1009 X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team Hi, The following vulnerability was published for sympa, but this is mainly for having a