Bug#972216: nmap: New NPSL 0.92 license likely non-free

2021-01-09 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi, Fabrice BAUZAC wrote: > FYI there is also a thread "nmap is non-free software" in: > > https://lists.defectivebydesign.org/archive/html/directory-discuss/2021-01/threads.html > > Apparently [1] the nmap author is listening to complaints and will > change license terms: Yep, there is a

Bug#972216: nmap: New NPSL 0.92 license likely non-free

2021-01-09 Thread Fabrice BAUZAC
FYI there is also a thread "nmap is non-free software" in: https://lists.defectivebydesign.org/archive/html/directory-discuss/2021-01/threads.html Apparently [1] the nmap author is listening to complaints and will change license terms: [...] I understand how the current license wording

Bug#972216: nmap: New NPSL 0.92 license likely non-free

2021-01-09 Thread Fabrice BAUZAC
FWIW, Fedora has just ruled out nmap: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/GZIDC4DHXZP67LFU7P2OT2AQVDJRHZ2M/

Bug#972216: nmap: New NPSL 0.92 license likely non-free

2020-11-07 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Vincent Lefevre > Yes, it is there, even in Debian/stable (buster), e.g. in > scan_engine.cc: Thanks. > * o Reads or includes copyrighted data files, such as Nmap's nmap-os-db * > * or nmap-service-probes. * > *

Bug#972216: nmap: New NPSL 0.92 license likely non-free

2020-11-07 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2020-11-07 18:00:04 +0100, Christoph Berg wrote: > Hi, > > while the above excerpt is only the explanation of the license, and > not the license itself, I think it is absolutely clear that including > nmap in anything and selling it as a product is prohibited (even if > the source is

Bug#972216: nmap: New NPSL 0.92 license likely non-free

2020-11-07 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Hilko Bengen > While I agree that the license is problematic, this is not entirely new. > Even back in version 5 there was very similar bizarre language (in > main.cc) about somebody's opinions on how the well-established term > "derivative work" is supposed to include merely running a program

Bug#972216: nmap: New NPSL 0.92 license likely non-free

2020-10-15 Thread Hilko Bengen
control: severity -1 normal Hi Göran, thanks for your bug report. I think that the issue is less serious than it seems at first glance (see below). At the moment, I'm inclined to update debian/copyright (which must be done anyway), close the issue, and be done with this. The alternatives would

Bug#972216: nmap: New NPSL 0.92 license likely non-free

2020-10-14 Thread Göran Weinholt
Package: nmap Version: 7.91+dfsg1-1 Severity: serious Justification: DFSG (Please downgrade or close if I'm wrong about this. I saw on guix-devel that nmap has a new license and they believe it's non-free, which I agree with, but I'm no expert, and I'm just filing this bug to have more eyes on