tags 972885 + upstream
thanks
Hi Rob, thanks for your reply.
Rob Browning wrote:
> Nice catch. Have you, or are you already planning to post this
> upstream?
Well, I haven't done so but could certainly do it. I assume the Gnus
development list ("ding") would be more appropriate than an Emacs
Florent Rougon writes:
> The problem can be solved either by me not using the above configuration
> bit anymore (which is of course a regression), or by making the
> `article' variable use dynamic binding before the failing `funcall' in
> `gnus-summary-highlight-line' (see the attached patch;
retitle 972885 Lexical binding causes regression for gnus-summary-highlight
thanks
The problem appears to be due to the (presumably recent) use of lexical
binding in /usr/share/emacs/27.1/lisp/gnus/gnus-sum.el.gz
(cf. lexical-binding:t on the first line).
It is triggered by this piece of
Package: emacs
Version: 1:27.1+1-2
Severity: normal
Hello,
After upgrading my emacs packages today:
[UPGRADE] emacs:amd64 1:26.3+1-2 -> 1:27.1+1-2
[UPGRADE] emacs-bin-common:amd64 1:26.3+1-2 -> 1:27.1+1-2
[UPGRADE] emacs-bin-common-dbgsym:amd64 1:26.3+1-2 -> 1:27.1+1-2
[UPGRADE]
4 matches
Mail list logo
