On Sun, 11 Jun 2023 at 08:25:16 +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 09:35:08PM +0200, Joachim Wiedorn wrote:
> > Simon McVittie wrote on 2021-09-12 22:43:
> >
> > > Now that bullseye has been released, should lilo be removed from unstable
> > > so that it will not be in any
Hello Joachim,
hello Simon,
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 09:35:08PM +0200, Joachim Wiedorn wrote:
> Simon McVittie wrote on 2021-09-12 22:43:
>
> > Now that bullseye has been released, should lilo be removed from unstable
> > so that it will not be in any future Debian release either?
>
> I think the
Simon McVittie wrote on 2021-09-12 22:43:
> Now that bullseye has been released, should lilo be removed from unstable
> so that it will not be in any future Debian release either?
I think the package should stay for a time in unstable, say 12 months?
There a some people managing many server and
On Fri, 06 Nov 2020 at 00:32:22 +0100, Joachim Wiedorn wrote:
> I am maintainer and developer of lilo, but have closed
> development with version 24.2 in year 2016. Since this time some people
> wanted to overtake development, but didn't do it after all.
...
> Because of this items, I register a
Package: lilo
Severity: critical
Version: 1:24.2-5
I plan to orphan this package. It should not be included into next stable
release (bullseye). I am maintainer and developer of lilo, but have closed
development with version 24.2 in year 2016. Since this time some people
wanted to overtake
5 matches
Mail list logo
