> Can simply replacing the dependency in all of them with bbolt work?
I don't know myself, but some upstream think it's not a trivial change. For
example, see:
https://github.com/hashicorp/raft-boltdb/pull/19#issuecomment-703732437
In short: hashicorp-raft-boltdb wants to make sure there's no
Hi Andreas,
On Sat, 12 Dec 2020 18:48:52 +0100 Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> So after wasting my time here I finally realized that apparently
> boltdb is archived upstream. It will not receive any fixes.
>
> Apparently golang-github-coreos-bbolt is a maintained feature-extended
>
Hello again,
So after wasting my time here I finally realized that apparently
boltdb is archived upstream. It will not receive any fixes.
Apparently golang-github-coreos-bbolt is a maintained feature-extended
fork. We should likely encurage moving to that and get boltdb removed
from debian.
The
Hello again,
On Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 05:59:37PM +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> 1 down, 1 to go info below.
>
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 10:03:31AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> [...]
> > > === RUN TestBucket_Stats
> > > bucket_test.go:1172: unexpected BranchPageN: 0
Hello all,
1 down, 1 to go info below.
On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 10:03:31AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: golang-github-boltdb-bolt
> Version: 1.3.1-7
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS on ppc64el
> Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
> Usertags: ftbfs-20201209 ftbfs-bullseye
Source: golang-github-boltdb-bolt
Version: 1.3.1-7
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on ppc64el
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201209 ftbfs-bullseye ftbfs-ppc64el
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on ppc64el. At the same time, it did not
6 matches
Mail list logo