On 2021-03-02 01:29:19 +0100, Reiner Herrmann wrote:
> I've raised the question upstream what the intended behaviour of ${HOME}
> is, whether is should apply to the private home as well or not.
> I can imagine that one would also be interested in having ${HOME} rules
> apply to the private
Control: forward -1 https://github.com/netblue30/firejail/issues/4026
Control: severity -1 normal
Hi Vincent,
On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 12:22:09AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> This is misused in the case of a private home directory. This rule
> should apply against the original home directory,
On 2021-03-01 19:25:22 +0100, Reiner Herrmann wrote:
> Hi Vincent,
>
> On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 02:49:32AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > When using --private=, an existing "bin" directory in
> > is read-only. This is silly: this means that one cannot restart
> > a firejail session:
> >
>
Hi Vincent,
On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 02:49:32AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> When using --private=, an existing "bin" directory in
> is read-only. This is silly: this means that one cannot restart
> a firejail session:
>
[...]
>
> I don't see the point to have "bin" read-only in this case,
Package: firejail
Version: 0.9.64.4-2
Severity: important
When using --private=, an existing "bin" directory in
is read-only. This is silly: this means that one cannot restart
a firejail session:
zira:~> firejail --private=$HOME/fj-test zsh
Reading profile /etc/firejail/default.profile
Reading
5 matches
Mail list logo
