Am Mittwoch, 14. April 2021, 17:36:19 CEST schrieb Christoph Berg:
> Re: Johannes Ranke
>
> > > Everything should be detailed in
> > > /usr/share/doc/postgresql-common/README.Debian.gz.
> >
> > How about inserting a pointer to this (very helpful and carefully
> > prepared)
> > document in the
Re: Johannes Ranke
> > Everything should be detailed in
> > /usr/share/doc/postgresql-common/README.Debian.gz.
>
> How about inserting a pointer to this (very helpful and carefully prepared)
> document in the release notes under 5.3? I think it is important for
> administrators to be aware that
...
> It would probably be a good idea to include the "-p 5433" argument in
> the cluster selection algorithm - so far I refrained from doing that
> in order not to create more corner cases, but I guess it just makes
> sense. (And granted, -p 54NN is also how I select my local version NN
>
Control: retitle -1 pg_wrapper: Include -p argument in port selection
Control: severity -1 wishlist
> $ pg_lsclusters
> Ver Cluster Port StatusOwnerData directory
> Log file
> 9.6 main5432 down,binaries_missing postgres /var/lib/postgresql/9.6/main
>
Package: postgresql-common
Version: 225
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
I have upgraded this buster system to bullseye. I did not do anything
postgresql related during the upgrade and phppgadmin kept working, so I
kept entering data with that. I think both clusters (11 and 13) were
running at
5 matches
Mail list logo
