Hi,
Le mardi 08 juin 2021 à 14:58 +0200, Jochen Sprickerhof a écrit :
>
> friendly ping on the sagemath issue as it will be dropped from
> testing
> on the 18., otherwise.
> As far as I read there are a number of proposals (downgrade, ignore
> test
> results..) besides fixing the tests. I'm
Hi,
friendly ping on the sagemath issue as it will be dropped from testing
on the 18., otherwise.
As far as I read there are a number of proposals (downgrade, ignore test
results..) besides fixing the tests. I'm happy to help with this but
leave it to the maintainers how to approach this.
Hi,
On 5/18/21 8:25 PM, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
>
> I think there are a number of problems:
> - Tests not being executed due to the open file limit ("Killing test" in
> the log). If you want to use the tests as an indicator if the build works,
> you should make sure the all tests are
* Julien Puydt [2021-05-18 17:47]:
Upstream manages to ship version with no error because they ship
hundreds of deps to an exact version for which they fitted the
testsuite to pass. We ship those deps as separate packages, because
they're actually not sagemath-specific [look at the list, it's
Hi,
Le mardi 18 mai 2021 à 15:31 +0200, Jochen Sprickerhof a écrit :
>
> * Julien Puydt [2021-05-18 07:56]:
> > 1) Upstream itself uses the testsuite in the sense of "shouldn't
> > have
> > too many failing tests", and it still allows to detect when a build
> > is
> > utterly broken, so we
Hi Julien,
* Julien Puydt [2021-05-18 07:56]:
1) Upstream itself uses the testsuite in the sense of "shouldn't have
too many failing tests", and it still allows to detect when a build is
utterly broken, so we shouldn't disable it.
Debian doesn't necessarily need to do the same as upstream
Hi,
Le lundi 17 mai 2021 à 15:20 +0200, Jochen Sprickerhof a écrit :
> Hi Julien,
>
> * Julien Puydt [2021-05-17 09:01]:
> > I tried to create a testing sbuild and compile sagemath 9.2-2 with
> > it,
> > and it worked so unless I made a mistake in my setup, something
> > made
> > that bug go
Hi Julien,
* Julien Puydt [2021-05-17 09:01]:
I tried to create a testing sbuild and compile sagemath 9.2-2 with it,
and it worked so unless I made a mistake in my setup, something made
that bug go away...
Can someone independently give it a try?
I triggered reproducible-builds again:
Hi Scott,
* John Scott [2021-05-03 00:35]:
Has anyone been able to reproduce this? Attempting to build Sage in a
fresh unstable environment succeeds for me; perhaps the build failure
was spurious.
I triggered reproducible builds yesterday:
Has anyone been able to reproduce this? Attempting to build Sage in a
fresh unstable environment succeeds for me; perhaps the build failure
was spurious.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
10 matches
Mail list logo
