Bug#989399: nauty FTCBFS -- multiple reasons

Control: severity -1 important Greetings everyone, focusing on the baseline violation aspect… Helmut Grohne, on 2021-06-02: > The check does not want to know whether the compiler supports > popcnt (which could be determined using AC_LINK_IFELSE), but whether the > CPU does and AC_LINK_IFELSE

Bug#989399: nauty FTCBFS -- multiple reasons

Hi Nilesh, On 2021-06-03 13:05, Nilesh Patra wrote: > On Thu, 3 Jun 2021 at 13:10, Andrius Merkys > wrote: > On 2021-06-02 19:29, Nilesh Patra wrote: > > Nauty fails to cross build due to two reasons: > > > > 1. It uses AC_RUN_IFELSE testing which cannot

Bug#989399: nauty FTCBFS -- multiple reasons

Hello Andrius On Thu, 3 Jun 2021 at 13:10, Andrius Merkys wrote: > Hi Nilesh, > > On 2021-06-02 19:29, Nilesh Patra wrote: > > Nauty fails to cross build due to two reasons: > > > > 1. It uses AC_RUN_IFELSE testing which cannot heppen during cross build > >Simply replacing it by

Bug#989399: nauty FTCBFS -- multiple reasons

Hi Nilesh, On 2021-06-02 19:29, Nilesh Patra wrote: > Nauty fails to cross build due to two reasons: > > 1. It uses AC_RUN_IFELSE testing which cannot heppen during cross build >Simply replacing it by AC_LINK_IFELSE does the trick. Please find the >patch for this below, and consider

Bug#989399: nauty FTCBFS -- multiple reasons

Control: retitle -1 nauty: i386 baseline violation by using popcnt Control: severity -1 serious Control: tags -1 - patch On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 09:59:23PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: > Nauty fails to cross build due to two reasons: > > 1. It uses AC_RUN_IFELSE testing which cannot heppen during

Bug#989399: nauty FTCBFS -- multiple reasons

Package: nauty Version: 2.7r1+ds-2 Severity: normal Tags: patch User: debian-cr...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftcbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: nil...@debian.org, debian-cr...@lists.debian.org Dear Maintainer, Nauty fails to cross build due to two reasons: 1. It uses AC_RUN_IFELSE testing which cannot