On Fri, 2022-02-18 at 19:11 -0800, Ryan Tandy wrote:
> I removed "pwdMustChange: TRUE" from the policy and then the tests
> passed. Not sure if this is the correct fix, but at least I don't
> currently see anything in test_pamcmds.expect that would be expecting
> a forced reset?
Applying this
[Salvatore Bonaccorso 2022-04-25]
> Are there any news on this bug? nss-pam-ldapd is currently hinted for
> removal from testing due to this bug (not happened yet though).
Today the debian-fbx and kwartz-client packages was removed from testing
because they depend on nss-pam-ldapd, due to the
Hi Arthur,
On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 07:11:24PM -0800, Ryan Tandy wrote:
> Hi Arthur,
>
> sorry for the long delayed followup.
>
> On Sun, Nov 14, 2021 at 04:20:03PM +0100, Arthur de Jong wrote:
> > > However the test_pamcmds script fails with the new version. The login
> > > with the correct
Hi Arthur,
sorry for the long delayed followup.
On Sun, Nov 14, 2021 at 04:20:03PM +0100, Arthur de Jong wrote:
However the test_pamcmds script fails with the new version. The login
with the correct password fails, the issue seems to be (from
nslcd.log):
nslcd: [a88611] DEBUG: got
Control: tags -1 + patch
Hi Ryan,
On Fri, 2021-06-04 at 11:19 -0700, Ryan Tandy wrote:
> Hi. The attached patch updates the test slapd config to support
> OpenLDAP 2.5 in addition to 2.4.
Thanks for the patch. I've applied it in the upstream repo and I plan
to make a new release soon.
>
Hi. The attached patch updates the test slapd config to support OpenLDAP
2.5 in addition to 2.4.
However the test_pamcmds script fails with the new version. The login
with the correct password fails, the issue seems to be (from nslcd.log):
2.4/good:
nslcd: [a88611] DEBUG: got
Source: nss-pam-ldapd
Version: 0.9.11-1
Severity: medium
Hi there!
We're currently working on getting OpenLDAP 2.5 into experimental, so
that we can start slowly working on its migration. As a side note,
Ubuntu is already planning to ship OpenLDAP 2.5 in the next release
(Impish, 21.10).
While
7 matches
Mail list logo
