Hi!
On Sat, 2023-07-29 at 10:44 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On ia64, webkit2gtk FTBFS due to g-ir-scanner not understading the syntax used
> in the header [1]:
>
> /usr/include/ia64-linux-gnu/sys/ucontext.h:92: syntax error, unexpected
> typedef-name in ' \
> unsigned long
Hi Andreas,
On 29-07-2023 21:52, Andreas Tille wrote:
IT can't be uploaded since the new version will not build due to the
missing dependencies that need to clear new.
As I understand it, you don't need to wait with *uploading*, the
buildd's will just wait building until the build
Package: torbrowser-launcher
Version: 0.3.3-6
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: bugreport.debian.acco...@simonedeiana.xyz
Dear Maintainer,
Currently the torbrowser-launcher package tries to download the tor browser
binary using an outdated naming scheme.
Instead of downloading from
Control: fixed 1037226 1.0.3-1+b3
Control: close 1037226
Yes, this can be closed.
(Let me try again if the BTS now knows about the binNMU version)
--
tobi
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: src:xtensor
Version: 0.24.3-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
xtensor builds with -march=native. I didn't check if there are code paths that
work with the default baseline on amd64. If there isn't such a code path, then
it is another bug report.
However building -march=native
Hi Olivier,
Quoting Olivier (2023-06-02 11:24:44)
> I volunteer to help to package Asterisk either in current official
> Debian repo or in an alternative repository.
Great!
Please subscribe to our mailinglist and discuss more there.
And please consider joining our IRC/Matrix chat room/channel
Hi Mattia,
CRS plugins is a new feature and it will be available from version 4.0:
https://coreruleset.org/docs/concepts/plugins/#how-to-install-a-plugin
"CRS 4.x will come with a plugins folder next to the rules folder."
If you take a look at the existing plugins (
Package: gedit
Version: 44.2-1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: mhaag85...@gmail.com
Dear Maintainer,
Keyboard shortcut Ctrl+F9 opens and closes the side panel instead of the bottom
panel.
(Keyboard shortcut F9 does open and close the side panel as expected.)
-- Package-specific info:
--
Hi Axel!
I'm a little confused here...
You say the machine is a Thinkpad X230, but the attached cpuinfo says
you have an Atom CPU and the DMI data says it's an ASUSTeK Eee
PC. What hardware are we actually looking at here please?
On Sun, Jul 30, 2023 at 01:48:47PM +0200, Axel Stammler wrote:
Package: logwatch
Version: 7.7-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
I found various services do not work on a fresh bookworm installation.
They do on bullseye.
The services that do not work includes:
audit, kernel, postfix, sshd, sssd, stunnel, and systemd
This cause is the rsyslog removal.
Package: tp-smapi-dkms
Version: 0.43-3
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: andrey.spit...@gmail.com
Dear Maintainer,
Dkms module fails to build for 6.4 kernel. Please update debian package to
upstream release of tp-smapi.
https://github.com/linux-thinkpad/tp_smapi/pull/45
-- System Information:
Control: tag -1 confirmed
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 08:30:09AM +0400, Yadd wrote:
> Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
>
> On 7/25/23 21:02, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > Control: tag -1 moreinfo
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 11:36:54AM +0400, Yadd wrote:
> > > diff --git a/debian/changelog
Control: tag -1 confirmed
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 08:37:28AM +0400, Yadd wrote:
> Sorry, here is the new debdiff
Please go ahead.
Thanks,
--
Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org
Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw
4096R:
Package: scrub
Version: 2.6.1-1+b1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: upstream
- This application is out of date. Since 2014, many changes have occurred.
- The homepage is out of date. Should refer to
https://github.com/chaos/scrub
- Version +b1 is confusing.
- Consider downloading source direct from
Package: aerc
Version: 0.15.2-2
Severity: wishlist
Dear aerc maintainer,
There's no address book completion for the Reply-To field in the header when
composing emails.
To reproduce:
* Enable address book completion in aerc.conf: `address-book-cmd=abook
--mutt-query %s`
* Add the
On 7/30/23 18:12, Folkert van Heusden wrote:
* clean debian bookworm install
* install icingaweb2 and the other icinga packages
* trying to configure mysql via the web-interface
* get tons of deprecation warnings that make the web-interface unusable:
Nicolas Schier wrote:
>-while (<>) {
>+while () {
That gets rid of all the dangerous and bizarre behaviour. It is `safe'
in that sense. However, it would leave the program still accepting
extraneous arguments (and now ignoring them). If I were patching the
program I'd want to also change it to
Source: pytables
Version: 3.7.0-5
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
pytables fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]:
Source: rdflib
Version: 6.1.1-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
rdflib fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: groonga
Version: 13.0.1+dfsg-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
groonga fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[8]:
Source: pybtex
Version: 0.24.0-3
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
pybtex fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: python-vispy
Version: 0.6.6-3
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
python-vispy fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: nbconvert
Version: 6.5.3-4
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
nbconvert fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: python-padme
Version: 1.1.1-4
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
python-padme fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Just also noticed that 'bash --rcfile' returns an 'option requires an
argument' error... as expected, of course... :) ... but ::: it just
feels strange when the argument may be invalid and just ignored...
like ::: 'bash --rcfile ""' ... or 'bash --rcfile "non-existing"'.
again... if this is
Source: dbus-fast
Version: 1.87.5-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
dbus-fast fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: python-django-celery-results
Version: 2.5.1-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
python-django-celery-results fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20,
both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Source: vine
Version: 5.0.0+dfsg-3
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
vine fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: deap
Version: 1.3.1-4
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
deap fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering
Source: sagemath
Version: 9.5-6
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
sagemath fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]:
Source: wand
Version: 0.6.11-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
wand fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering
Source: mongo-c-driver
Version: 1.24.2-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
mongo-c-driver fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: flufl.password
Version: 1.3-5
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
flufl.password fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: python-libdiscid
Version: 2.0.2-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
python-libdiscid fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part
Source: ycm-cmake-modules
Version: 0.13.0-2
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
ycm-cmake-modules fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of
which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part
Source: ceres-solver
Version: 2.1.0+really2.1.0+dfsg-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
ceres-solver fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part
Source: python-pykka
Version: 3.1.1-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
python-pykka fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: snakemake
Version: 7.21.0-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
snakemake fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Package: src:xtensor
Version: 0.24.3-2
Severity: important
Tags: sid trixie
This will become an RC issue once LLVM-16 becomes the default in unstable. The
autopkg tests fail with:
[...]
1499s ./test_xtensor_lib
1499s [doctest] doctest version is "2.4.11"
1499s [doctest] run with "--help" for
Further inspection shows that this oops is caused by
intel_display_device_probe() returning NULL in
intel_device_info_driver_create() when Intel HD Graphics P4000
(PCI:8086:016a) is probed, which is further caused by
INTEL_IVB_Q_IDS(NULL) (struct { u32 devid; const struct
Niko Tyni writes:
>
> There's an upstream discussion at
> https://forum.polymake.org/viewtopic.php?t=1914 which does not look
> promising. Apparently polymake starting with 4.9 explicitly bails out
> for Perl >= 5.37 because Perl internal symbols that polymake was relying
> on are now hidden.
>
Hi Tobias,
thanks for your patches.
As you know :) since Bookworm Nginx is also able to work as WAF with
libmodsecurity3, and can use modsecurity-crs.
This means the package modsecurity-crs does not need to depend on Apache in
the future. And this implies that after install/upgrade the package
Package: mixxx
Version: 2.3.5+dfsg-1+b1
Severity: important
Followup-For: Bug #1039859
X-Debbugs-Cc: onit...@gmail.com
This issue does not occur for me on X.org.
While the rendering of album covers and the waveforms is suboptimal (lack of
interpolation, movement jitter, transparency issues at
Holger Wansing writes:
> Tests were successful, the results can be found on
> https://people.debian.org/~holgerw/release-notes_sphinx/www.debian.org/,
> in the exact same structure as they would appear on the Debian
> website.
nice - it looks like it's come on a long way from the previous
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Edward Betts
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: asgi-csrf
Version : 0.9
Upstream Author : Simon Willison
* URL : https://github.com/simonw/asgi-csrf
* License :
Hi David,
On Sat 29 Jul 2023 08:48:21 AM -03, David Bremner wrote:
Are you still working on this? For what it's worth I started some
packages for my own use at
https://salsa.debian.org/bremner/latte
Thanks for the reminder! The package is essentially done, but it had slipped
off
Package: gpg
Version: 2.2.40-1.1
Followup-For: Bug #1022702
X-Debbugs-Cc: alexandru.chirita4...@gmail.com
Dear Maintainer,
gpg version 2.2.40-1.1 doesn't include TPM 2.0 support and I believe it
should be included in Debian.
In my opinion Debian should support TPM 2.0 more, including at least a
Control: close -1
On Fri, 28 Jul 2023 12:17:09 +0100 Tj wrote:
> I wonder if Debian systemd maintainers can add some weight to the
importance of the issue being
> tackled by the devs (seeing as they are responsible for shipping the
failing code) ?
Sure, I'll add some weight: you appear to be
>> > Can/should this bug be closed?
>
> Yes, I think it could be.
Uhhmm... sorry, now I reviewed the whole issue and realised that
the first and second posts are about different problems.
PCRE2 dependency (second post) has been solved, but I think the
first one is not about the package
On Sun, 23 Jul 2023 at 21:13:38 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> The following vulnerability was published for librsvg.
>
> CVE-2023-38633[0]:
> | A directory traversal problem in the URL decoder of librsvg before
> | 2.56.3 could be used by local or remote attackers to disclose files
> | (on
Hi Tobias,
thanks for your report and other notes.
The mentioned configuration file (modsecurity.conf(.recommended))
is part of ModSecurity2. But the package itself
(modsecurity-apache) depends on modsecurity-crs, and this package
uses the same directory (/etc/modsecurity), so there is a strong
Package: guvcview
Version: 2.0.8-2
Severity: normal
In previous releases of Debian GuVCView was always a good tool for easy
video recording with an webcam.
In Debian 12 everything works except the recording of a video.
The recorded file only contains the sound and no video!
Every option has
Package: sway-notification-center
Version: 0.9.0-1
Severity: normal
Dear Sway notification centre maintainer,
When a notification is displayed in swaync, there's a seemingly irrelevant
error displayed alongside it:
Failed to run script: example-script
Output:
To reproduce:
* Run
Package: fwupd
Version: 1.9.3-1
Followup-For: Bug #945203
Dear Maintainer,
A warning displayed each time I login the system (Lenovo IdeaPad 340) says
there is an update available. After ignoring it for a few weeks, I tried
updating the firmware, specifically the UEFI dbx device (217 --> 371),
Source: flufl.bounce
Version: 4.0-3
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
flufl.bounce fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: python-public
Version: 2.3-4
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
python-public fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: sphinx-gallery
Version: 0.10.1-3
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
sphinx-gallery fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: flask-security
Version: 5.1.2-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
flask-security fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: sphinxcontrib-trio
Version: 1.1.2-2
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
sphinxcontrib-trio fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of
which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part
Source: quark-sphinx-theme
Version: 0.5.1-3
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
quark-sphinx-theme fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of
which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part
Source: logbook
Version: 1.5.3-5.2
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
logbook fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]:
Source: python-oslo.versionedobjects
Version: 3.1.0-2
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
python-oslo.versionedobjects fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20,
both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Source: pandas
Version: 1.5.3+dfsg-3
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
pandas fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Subject: reportbug: vorta diff feature broken
Package: vorta
Version: 0.8.10-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
there is a bug in the vorta package as it is part of Debian 12.0 and 12.1.
The diff feature for archives does not work: Select two backups / archives
and press the diff button.
I
Source: dasbus
Version: 1.7-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
dasbus fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Hi Daniel (and others following along),
Quoting Devel via Pkg-voip-maintainers (2023-05-26 23:07:04)
> I'm ready to help to keep asterisk in the Debian project.
>
> At this time I'm compiling from scratch on each new version (18 as well
> as 20), I know nothing about creating packages but able
Hi Marcelo,
Just to complement, using the recent version of nfdump from github, the
bug does not occur.
Thanks for the report. Do you by any chance know which exact commit
fixes this issue? Is the fix in 1.7.2 or post-1.7.2 (only in git master)?
I can update unstable to 1.7.2 or even the
Hi Daniel,
Quoting Daniel Huhardeaux via Pkg-voip-maintainers (2023-05-29 14:40:09)
> I try to create a deb file using dh_make
[...]
> Base package is asterisk-20-current.tar.gz
>
> Any clue?
Sorry, but this is a bugreport for tracking the general health of
packaging Asterisk officially for
Package: glasscoder
Version: 2.0.1-2
Severity: normal
Dear glasscoder maintainer,
I use SoX to generate a WAV file. When I try to stream it over HLS with
Glasscoder, it crashes.
```
$ sox -n out.wav synth 60
$ glasscoder --server-url="http://localhost:8080; --server-type=HLS
Hi,
thanks for report and the patch. I've picked up your modification
and added it to package's Git repository. The next version of the
package will build with that method:
https://salsa.debian.org/modsecurity-packaging-team/modsecurity-apache/-/blob/master/debian/rules#L19
Thanks,
a.
Package: vokoscreen-ng
Version: 3.5.0-1
Severity: important
I have an old installarion of vokoscreen V2.5 in the HDD that can be
started and used.
Installing this debian package V3.5 it crashes when trying to start.
Here is the console output:
$ vokoscreenNG
[vokoscreenNG] Desktop session is
package release.debian.org
tags 1039020 = bullseye pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian bullseye.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: schleuder
Version:
>> can you please explain how I can recreate the files *.tiktoken?
>> There seem to be some sources missing ...
>
> The two files in question are 50k lines of ASCII text that seem to be
> some kind of index / vocabulary, and I have no idea how they were
> created.
Perhaps there is some clues to
Hi,
Richard Lewis wrote (Sun, 30 Jul 2023
11:10:10 +0100):
> in [0] the '#' is meant to indicate 'run this as root', but the rst has
> '.. code-block:: shell' so the commands are being formatted as a
> comment.
Yes, there are different methods for including quoted material, and they are
Source: brian
Version: 2.5.4-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
brian fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: libsass-python
Version: 0.22.0-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
libsass-python fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: pydicom
Version: 2.3.1-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
pydicom fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: lazr.delegates
Version: 2.0.4-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
lazr.delegates fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: sphinx-autoapi
Version: 2.0.0-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
sphinx-autoapi fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: sphinx-notfound-page
Version: 0.8.3-2
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
sphinx-notfound-page fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of
which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part
Source: harp
Version: 1.18-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
harp fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[5]: Entering
Source: calcium
Version: 0.4.1-3
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
calcium fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[4]:
Source: openshot-qt
Version: 2.6.1+dfsg1-4
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
openshot-qt fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: behave
Version: 1.2.6-4
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
behave fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: sphinxcontrib-mermaid
Version: 0.9.2-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
sphinxcontrib-mermaid fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of
which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part
Source: sphinx-panels
Version: 0.6.0-2
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
sphinx-panels fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: terminaltables
Version: 3.1.10-2
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
terminaltables fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: python-intbitset
Version: 2.3.0-3.2
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
python-intbitset fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part
Source: pygame
Version: 2.1.2+dfsg-6
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
pygame fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: flufl.i18n
Version: 3.0.1-3
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
flufl.i18n fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: python-secretstorage
Version: 3.3.3-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
python-secretstorage fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of
which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part
Source: musicbrainzngs
Version: 0.7.1-4
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
musicbrainzngs fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: horizon
Version: 3:23.1.0-3
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
horizon fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: mopidy
Version: 3.4.1-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
mopidy fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: factory-boy
Version: 2.11.1-5
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
factory-boy fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: flask-babel
Version: 2.0.0-3
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
flask-babel fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: libglib-perl
Version: 3:1.329.3-2
Severity: important
Tags: upstream trixie sid
Forwarded: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/perl-glib/-/issues/3
libglib-perl has failing build tests & autopkgtests with glib 2.77.0
https://ci.debian.net/packages/libg/libglib-perl/unstable/amd64/
This issue
Source: glib2.0
Version: 2.77.0-1
Severity: wishlist
Control: block -1 by 1042551
I'm filing this bug to track issues blocking the release of glib 2.77
to Unstable. We have landed glib 2.77 in Ubuntu 23.10. I am thinking
we could land glib 2.77 in Unstable after GNOME 45 Beta in about a
week.
I
Package: libc6
Version: 2.37-6
Tags: upstream
The utmp(5) interface has broken its compatibility in 32-bit programs
built with -D_TIME_BITS=64. In bits/utmpx.h we see this:
,
| /* The fields ut_session and ut_tv must be the same size when compiled
|32- and 64-bit. This allows files and
Package: installation-reports
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: a...@users.sourceforge.net
(Please provide enough information to help the Debian
maintainers evaluate the report efficiently - e.g., by filling
in the sections below.)
Everything work well _after_ I remove the computer from the
1 - 100 of 246 matches
Mail list logo
