Package: varnish
Version: 3.0.2-1
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-
Package: vala-terminal
Version: 1.3-1
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy
Package: uzbl
Version: 0.0.0~git.2028-1
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-
Package: mythtv-status
Version: 0.9.3-1
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-poli
oraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jan 2012, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> The problem with 'service' is that it actually tried to start apache
>> while piuparts had created a policy-rc.d that prevents any service from
>> being started in the chroot. (Apache could not be star
On 2012-01-17 14:42, Fredrik Thulin wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> ...
>> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
>> the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8:
>
> Hi
>
> Th
Package: piuparts
Version: 0.42
Severity: normal
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
something to play with
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: fts
Version: 1.0-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
a release, thus the severity.
>From the attached
Package: xtell
Followup-For: Bug #656209
Forgot to attach the logfile ...
Andreas
xtell_2.10.7.log.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
Source: uhd-host
Followup-For: Bug #656119
Forgot to attach the logfile ...
Andreas
uhd-host_3.3.2-2.log.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
Package: cmucl-source
Version: 20c-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
a release, thus the severity.
>From the
Package: iptables-persistent
Version: 0.5.3
Severity: normal
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install.
>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
Selecting previously unselected package iptables-persist
Package: mumudvb
Version: 1.6-1
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to purge due
to a command not found. According to policy 7.2 you cannot rely on the
depends being available during purge, only the
Package: mon
Version: 1.2.0-5
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to purge.
>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
while removing mon ...
Removing mon ...
invoke-rc.d: policy-rc.d d
Package: update-notifier-kde
Version: 1.2.4
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-
Package: unison2.32.52-gtk
Version: 2.32.52-4
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):
http://www.debian.org/doc/debia
Package: tunapie
Version: 2.1.17-2.2
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/
Package: tecnoballz
Version: 0.92-5
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/c
Package: maradns
Version: 1.4.09-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
squeeze. It installed fine in squeeze, then the upgrade to wheezy fails
because it tries to overwrite other package
Package: vdr-plugin-streamdev-client
Version: 0.5.1+git20111211-1
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
squeeze. It installed fine in squeeze, then the upgrade to wheezy
succeeded, but p
Package: devscripts
Version: 2.11.2
Severity: normal
File: /usr/bin/bts
Hi,
while bts tag/usertag default to add ('+') new tags, affects replaces
the current set of packages with the package(s) in the argument.
This behavior is nonintuitive to me.
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-
;
Original Message
Subject: Processed: usertagging 656371, affects 656371, usertagging 656371,
affects 656371, usertagging 656371 ...
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 20:18:05 +
From: ow...@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
To: Andreas Beckmann
CC: Devscripts Devel Team (dev
Package: ttf-arphic-ukai-mbe
Version: 0.2.20080216.2-2
Severity: normal
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install.
>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
The following packages have unmet dependencie
Package: sl-modem-source
Version: 2.9.11~20110321-6
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
all dkms module source packages are called DRIVER-dkms [0], so I suggest
to rename this package which is the only one not following that
convention.
Andreas
[0] apt-cache rdepends dkms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb
Package: libghc-hsql-doc
Version: 1.8.1-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
squeeze. It installed fine in squeeze, then the upgrade to wheezy fails
because it tries to overwrite other
Package: libghc-hsql-mysql-doc
Version: 1.8.1-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
squeeze. It installed fine in squeeze, then the upgrade to wheezy fails
because it tries to overwrite
Package: libghc-edison-core-doc
Version: 1.2.1.3-6
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
squeeze. It installed fine in squeeze, then the upgrade to wheezy fails
because it tries to overwri
Package: piuparts
Version: 0.42
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
we need some solution to do distupgrade tests on "disappering" packages.
These can't currently be tested because they are no longer in the
package list of the target distribution.
One possibility could be
--extra-old-packages=the-disappea
Package: fts
Version: 1.0-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8:
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.
Package: snort
Version: 2.9.2-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
a release, thus the severity.
>From the attac
Package: ratbox-services-sqlite
Version: 1.2.4-1
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):
http://www.debian.org/doc/de
Package: openvswitch-pki
Version: 1.3.0-1
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-po
Package: olwm
Version: 3.2p1.4-28
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-
Package: apparmor-profiles
Version: 2.7.0~beta1+bzr1774-1
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):
http://www.debian.o
Package: aide-xen
Version: 0.15.1-5
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/c
Package: auto-complete-el
Version: 1.3.1-1
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-p
Source: aide-xen
Followup-For: Bug #656452
Forgot to attach the logfile ...
aide-dynamic has the same problem, too.
Andreas
aide-xen_0.15.1-5.log.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
aide-dynamic_0.15.1-5.log.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
Package: jwchat
Version: 1.0+dfsg-1
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/c
Package: libcipux-cat-web-perl
Version: 3.4.0.3-4
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):
http://www.debian.org/doc/d
Package: libcupt2
Version: 0_2.3.2
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch
Package: liblemonldap-ng-handler-perl
Version: 1.1.2-1
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):
http://www.debian.org/
Package: libpam-poldi
Version: 0.4.1-2.1
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-pol
Package: libvirt-bin
Version: 0.9.8-2
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy
Package: loop-aes-utils
Version: 2.16.2-2
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-po
Package: boinc-client
Version: 7.0.8+dfsg-2
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-
Package: bucardo
Version: 4.4.8-1
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-
Package: zope2.12-sandbox
Version: 2.12.20-2
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install,
remove (but not purge), and install again. Before the second
installation the package is in config-files-r
Package: ampache
Version: 3.6-alpha1+dfsg-2
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install,
remove (but not purge), and install again. Before the second
installation the package is in config-files-re
Package: fex
Version: 2029-2
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install,
remove (but not purge), and install again. Before the second
installation the package is in config-files-remaining sta
Package: stterm
Version: 0.0~20110920+hg212-2
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):
http://www.debian.org/doc/debia
Package: screen
Version: 4.1.0~20120320gitdb59704-3
Severity: important
Hi,
in a clean sid chroot screen produced errors while configuring (but it
does not fail):
Setting up screen (4.1.0~20120320gitdb59704-3) ...
dpkg: error: --compare-versions takes three arguments:
Type dpkg --help
Package: mingw-w64-dev,mingw-w64
Version: 3.0~svn4933-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install
because it tries to overwrite other packages files without declaring a
replaces relation.
See pol
Package: schleuder
Version: 2.2.1-1
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your packages cronjob produces
output after the package has been removed.
>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
0m33.2s INFO: Package
Package: biomaj
Version: 1.2.0-5
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-m
Package: masqmail
Version: 0.3.4-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed the piuparts
upgrade test because dpkg detected a conffile as being modified and then
prompted the user for an action. As there is
Version: 1.5.3-2
On 2012-06-22 15:03, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> which was filed against the serendipity package:
>
> #673971: serendipity: unowned files after purge (policy 6.8, 10.8):
> /etc/apache2/conf.d/serendipity.conf
severity serious
thanks
Raising the severity to serious as I see now about 60 packages (e.g.
libjboss-*-java) failing the squeeze=>wheezy dist-upgrade test because
of this,
I'm not sure about the correct package to assign this to.
On 2012-06-15 03:10, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> duri
On 2012-06-23 11:24, markus schnalke wrote:
> Surprisingly, the piuparts website reports the package to be successful:
> http://piuparts.debian.org/sid/source/m/masqmail.html
That's not an upgrade test.
Look here (some time in the future, package is not yet tested,
dependencies are still que
On 2012-06-23 12:55, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> I was suggested to turn `roundcube-sqlite` into some kind of
> transitional package. But it seems difficult for me to choose between
> `roundcube-mysql` and `roundcube-sqlite`. And it does not explain why
> APT does not know how to handle this.
This sho
[dropping d-d@ as this question gets package specific]
>> On the other hand, adding the following transitional package:
>>
>> Package: roundcube-sqlite
>> Depends: roundcube-mysql | roundcube-pgsql
[...]
>> solves the problem.
There is another question for the -sqlite -> -mysql transition: How do
On 2012-06-23 19:08, Vincent Bernat wrote:
>> There is another question for the -sqlite -> -mysql transition: How do
>> you migrate the data?
>
> There is no migration path. That does not seem too hard but not too easy
> either. There is already a bug report where the question was asked (but
> may
On 2012-06-15 11:13, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Once one of these bugs is fixed in sid I'll reschedule a full piuparts check
> of sid to look for more impact of this bug, so please drop me a notice how
> the new warning looks like.
After I rechecked sid/amd64 with piuparts and d
Package: wordpress
Version: 3.4+dfsg-2
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-polic
Package: libswirl-java-gcj
Version: 1.1-2
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-po
Package: pike7.8-image
Version: 7.8.352-dfsg-6
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'squeeze'.
It installed fine in 'squeeze', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails
because it tries to overwrit
Package: liblapack3
Version: 3.4.1-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
while doing piuparts tests distupgrading from squeeze to sid I noticed a
cooperation problem between octave and liblapack3:
[...]
Preparing to replace liblapack3gf 3.3.1-1 (using
..
On 2012-06-24 19:42, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> while doing piuparts tests distupgrading from squeeze to sid I noticed a
That was a test on distupgrading "testing" to "sid", not squeeze. Sorry.
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debia
Package: controlaula
Version: 1.8.0-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package ships files in
/etc/opt which falls in the same category as /opt that is reserved for
add-on software and is not to be used by Debian
Package: maildir-bulletin
Version: 0.69
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package ships directories in
the /home tree which is a policy/FHS violation.
/home is a site specific hierarchy and not to be used by any pa
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.8
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
lintian should check for shipping files in more FHS/policy violating
locations:
/home (maildir-bulletin ships /home/bulletins/removed/)
/etc/opt (meant for configuration files for software in /opt)
(controlaula ships
/
Package: pdns-server
Version: 3.1-3
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/c
Package: pdns-server
Version: 3.1-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed the piuparts
upgrade test because dpkg detected a conffile as being modified and then
prompted the user for an action. As there i
Package: code-aster-gui,code-aster-run
Followup-For: Bug #670293
Hi,
the problem is still present in the lates release:
Setting up code-aster-run (1.10.4-2) ...
Installing new version of config file /etc/codeaster/profile.csh ...
Configuration file `/etc/codeaster/asrun'
==> Modified
On 2012-06-25 09:21, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>> /local/ not owned
>> /local/piuparts/not owned
>> /local/piuparts/piupartss/ not owned
>> /local/piuparts/piupartss/.cache/ not owned
>
> Must be piuparts-related.
No. Just some dependency seriously misbehaving. I've filed simi
On 2012-06-24 19:04, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> looks like ghc made it in first (with a hint by luk, so no fair
> comparison). I’m not sure if #676874 can be downgraded, though, as it
> would still break installing packages from squeeze.
Downgrading wouldn't help anything anyway as the fixed dpkg i
after removing a module try to remove the path (below
/lib/modules/KVERS) were the module was installed to cleanup any
remaining empty directories
Closes: #657145
---
dkms |3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/dkms b/dkms
index 042acc0..c96cd8f 100644
--- a/dkms
+++ b/dkms
@@ -
Package: libguestfs-tools
Version: 1:1.18.2-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'wheezy'.
It installed fine in 'wheezy', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails
because it tries to overwrite f
tag 679025 pending
thanks
On 2012-06-25 22:33, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> amd-clinfo depends on amd-libopencl1. The manpage says (in the name section)
> that it reports fglrx OpenCL system status (the description section should
> probably also be improved).
Description and manpage updated.
> So
# added the missing font sources, but misplaced the mktexlsr call
# so that it is run too late - after the fonts are used
notfixed 574235 3.65+svn20090927-2
# dropped the now obsolete mktexlsr call, the font sources were
# already removed in 4.01c-1
fixed 574235 4.01e-6
thanks
On 2012-06-26 19:2
Package: controlaula
Version: 1.8.0-2
Followup-For: Bug #678851
Hi,
the updated ackage still ships a directory tree in /etc/opt:
/etc/opt
/etc/opt/chrome
/etc/opt/chrome/policies
/etc/opt/chrome/policies/managed
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
Package: libguestfs-tools
Followup-For: Bug #678977
Hi,
the problem is still present in the latest upload.
The Breaks/Replaces you added are lacking the epoch 1: ...
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
Package: libmagickcore5-extra
Version: 8:6.7.7.9-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'wheezy'.
It installed fine in 'wheezy', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails
because it tries to overwr
Package: naist-jdic
Version: 1:0.4.3-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
a release, thus the severity.
>From th
Package: oar-common,oar-web-status
Followup-For: Bug #674657
Hi,
oar 2.5.2-3 still leaves some empty directories around:
* oar-common: /etc/oar/
* oar-web-status: /var/lib/oar/
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
Package: ldm-themes
Version: 12.06.1
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8:
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintai
Package: fai-quickstart
Version: 4.0.3
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to purge.
According to policy 7.2 you cannot rely on the depends being available
during purge, only the essential packages a
Package: fusioninventory-agent
Version: 2.2.3-1
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to purge due
to a command not found. According to policy 7.2 you cannot rely on the
depends being available during
reassign 668765 piuparts 0.44
fixed 668765 0.45
close 668765
thanks
On 2012-06-27 21:28, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Apr 14, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>
>>> 0m27.0s ERROR: FAIL: Package purging left files on system:
>>> /etc/news/whoami not owned
>> I can't see how this could be deleted since the fil
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
These are transitional packages, moving to names without the '-2.6'
infix.
The subject line was generated by reportbug 6.4 after asking me several
questions for the first package (I added the entry for the second one)
but that does not match the format men
Package: libchado-perl
Version: 1.22-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
a release, thus the severity.
>From th
On 2012-02-12 20:46, Thomas Lange wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> ich weiss nicht, ob du meine Mails bzgl. des dracut bugs
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=657754
> bekommen hast. Ich kann den Fehler nicht nachvollziehen.
piuparts installs the packages to be tested in a minimal chroot
Package: samba4
Version: 4.0.0~alpha17.dfsg2-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
a release, thus the severity.
Package: expeyes
Version: 2.0.0-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package starts processes
where it shouldn't. This is very probably due to not using invoke-rc.d
as mandated by policy 9.3.3.2. This is seriously d
Package: libroar-compat2,libroar-dev,roaraudio
Version: 1.0~beta0~pr0-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'testing'.
It installed fine in 'testing', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails
bec
Package: libblas3
Version: 1.2.20110419-3~exp1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'sid'.
It installed fine in 'sid', then the upgrade to 'experimental' fails
at the call to update-alter
Package: libopenblas-base
Version: 0.1alpha2.3-1~exp1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'sid'.
It installed fine in 'sid', then the upgrade to 'experimental' fails.
>From the attached
Package: gcin
Version: 2.7.2+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'squeeze'.
It installed fine in 'squeeze', then the upgrade to 'sid fails
because it tries to overwrite other pack
Package: dtc-xen
Version: 0.5.15-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed the piuparts
upgrade test because dpkg detected a conffile as being modified and then
prompted the user for an action. As there is
Package: apt-cudf
Version: 2.9.13-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
a release, thus the severity.
>From the a
Package: perl
Version: 5.14.2-7
Severity: wishlist
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
there are a few perl modules that are now included in the perl 5.14 core
module set and the 'old' separate module packages are no longer
installable in sid (the packages were removed from wh
1301 - 1400 of 15482 matches
Mail list logo
