retitle 547232 ITA: libmpcdec -- MusePack decoder - development files
owner 547232 anto...@dyne.org
thanks
Hi,
I'm adopting this package and I will prepare a new package hopefully
today, the I need someone that will sponsor my upload, I will send the
request on debian-mentors as usual.
Cheers
Package: mutt
Version: 1.5.20-4
Severity: normal
This patch fixes the problem:
http://kb.wisc.edu/images/group12/4091/smime_keys.diff
Also see upstream bug http://bugs.mutt.org/3339
Cheers
Antoni
-- Package-specific info:
Mutt 1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Copyright (C) 1996-2009 Michael R. Elkins and
Hi,
I'm available for adopting the package; I saw that petere@ wants to
adopt it; any plan to create a team on alioth?
Cheers
Antonio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Antonio Radici anto...@dyne.org
* Package name: gross
Version : 1.0.2
Upstream Author : Eino Tuominen e...@utu.fi, Antti Siira an...@utu.fi
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/gross/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C
reassign 548577 mutt
retitle 548577 mutt terminates with gpgme = 1.2
tag 548577 +confirmed upstream pending
forwarded 548577 http://bugs.mutt.org/3330
thanks
Taking back this bug, after having a look at mutt-dev it seems that this
patch solves the problem:
On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 09:23:59PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 08:33 +, Antonio Radici wrote:
I'm available for adopting the package; I saw that petere@ wants to
adopt it; any plan to create a team on alioth?
So, are we OK with using collab-maint and git? (see
tags 594451 +confirmed pending
thanks
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 02:33:10PM +0200, Stefano Rivera wrote:
severity 575581 important
tags 575581 -patch
severity 594451 serious
tags 594451 +patch
thanks
Russell's report, bug 575581, says:
Program version 4.7 doesn't match environment version
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package postgrey 1.32-6, it contains a fix to resolve the serious
#594451 which breaks a lenny-squeeze upgrade of postgrey
If you have any questions, let me know.
Cheers
It seems that the procedure has changed, I have created version 1.32-6 and
uploaded it to unstable, then submitted #606533 with an unblock request to
release.debian.org.
Cheers
Antonio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 07:18:32PM +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
Can you please check again and re-upload?
Hi,
for some reason I didn't get the rejection email; the package has just
been uploaded and I got a mail confirming that everything is OK :-)
Thanks for taking care of the unblocking.
Please ignore my last correspondence, it seems that my upload keeps
having problems, I will recreate teh package and re-upload it (I hope
for the last time) tomorrow.
Cheers
Antonio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
tag 569500 +confirmed pending
thanks
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 01:11:18AM -0400, James Vega wrote:
I've been seeing this too and it is indeed caused by that patch. At the
end of mutt_view_attachment, mutt_unlink is called which tries to open
the temp file O_RDWR. This fails due to the chmod
tag 608019 +confirmed pending
thanks
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 02:35:01AM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Package: mutt
Version: 1.5.20-5~bpo50+1
Severity: normal
Hello Maintainer,
currently I am using 1.5.20-5~bpo50+1 and on another machines 1.5.18-6
from Lenny and versions from
tag 599659 +confirmed moreinfo wontfix
thanks
On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 11:10:57PM +0100, Arne Wichmann wrote:
The option is abort_unmodified.
Given that option I would not consider this behaviour a bug.
Hi Josh,
as Arne says you can modify the behavior of what happens using an option
in
tag 600962 +confirmed
thanks
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 10:44:34PM +0100, Nikolaus Schulz wrote:
This issue is a another bad side effect of bug #600962 IMAP: [mutt]
ignores \Recent flag but rolls its own replacement.
Hi Nikolas,
I believe that these are two different issues, #600962 should
Hi Jö,
thanks for your report, this needs to be forwarded upstream, I will do
so.
Cheers
Antonio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
tag 603803 +moreinfo
thanks
Hi Michelle,
can you experience the same problem with 1.5.20-1 that is in
experimental? Do you want me to prepare a backport for you?
Cheers
Antonio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 08:56:15PM +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
Hello,
any chance that these translation fixes still reach Squeeze? I'm
rather confident that a freeze exception for them would be granted.
I will prepare a new version and ask for an exception today.
Cheers
Antonio
--
To
tag 603288 +confirmed pending upstream
forwarded 603288 http://bugs.mutt.org/3459
thanks
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 04:01:41PM +0100, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
Package: mutt
Version: 1.5.20-9
Severity: normal
When opening a large folder (~4k messages) on an Exchange 2010 server mutt
hangs
tag 572534 +confirmed wontfix
thanks
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 09:38:21PM +, brian m. carlson wrote:
With respect to the request to make MS an alias for CP, I
request that you not do that. The only character sets that mutt should
recognize are those specified at
tag 599136 +confirmed upstream
thanks
I will forward this upstream later on
Cheers
Antonio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
tag 599309 +confirmed upstream
thanks
Hi Toni,
thanks for your report, I will forward this issue upstream.
Cheers
Antonio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
tag 597266 +confirmed wontfix
thanks
Hi Remco,
for me this one is a wontfix because smime_keys is correctly reporting
the error, unless the certificate is self-signed you will need to
include the root certificate in the p12, I believe there should be some
option in the apple keychain application
tag 594835 +moreinfo
thanks
Hi Michelle,
I believe you opened a similar bug before, didn't you?
Can you please refer to any bug number you opened before for the same
issue so that we can merge them and continue the investigation on the
same bug.
Cheers
Antonio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
tag 595471 +confirmed upstream
thanks
Hi Vladimir,
thanks for your report, I will forward this upstream.
Cheers
Antonio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
tag 537061 +confirmed upstream pending
thanks
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 06:50:53PM +0200, Simon Paillard wrote:
It breaks so many attachement (nightmare on translation mailing lists)
that I increased the severity.
Could you consider revert
http://dev.mutt.org/trac/changeset/392e945dfba7 and
tag 594076 +moreinfo
thanks
Hi Matija,
I think this was somewhat fixed in 1.5.21, this is due to the new mail
handling that the upstream guys are trying to implement before the 1.6
release.
Additionally, if I'm not wrong, there should be an option in 1.5.21 to
revert to the previous behavior, it
tag 592874 +confirmed upstream
thanks
Hi Alberto, thanks for your report.
I will forward this upstream.
Cheers
Antonio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
tag 590246 +confirmed upstream
forwarded 590246 http://bugs.mutt.org/3472
thanks
Hi Stanislav,
thanks for your report, it seems to me that this is being addressed by
http://bugs.mutt.org/3472, please let me know if that is not the case.
Cheers
Antonio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
tag 206364 -moreinfo
tag 206364 +wontfix
thanks
No,
I don't believe so, since this format of addresses is rarely used and we
will try to stay as close to upstream as possible, I'm tagging this bug
as wontfix.
Cheers
Antonio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
tag 589430 +confirmed upstream
thanks
Hi,
I will forward this bug upstream.
Cheers
Antonio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
tag 585559 +unreproducible moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
please provide the info requested by Christoph when you get a chance.
anyway 1.5.20-9, which is being shipped with squeeze, is not using
libtokyocabinet as far as I'm aware of.
Cheers
Antonio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
tag 584266 +confirmed upstream
tag 584266 -moreinfo
thanks
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 09:38:18AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
I meant to include this information, actually. I have not noticed
this behaviour before, and I deal a lot with the index and encoded
headers. And indeed: -7 is not
tag 585386 +moreinfo
thanks
Hi Morty,
despite the fact that the command itself fixes the issue for Outlook MUA
I'm not sure how many MUA will be broken when we will change the command
and, in any case, a change on the behavior of smime_keys should be
announced properly; we may forward this
tag 583251 +confirmed upstream
forwarded 583251 http://bugs.mutt.org/3419
thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
tag 579330 +moreinfo
thanks
Hi Philipp,
can you please check http://bugs.mutt.org/3403 and see if it is the same
issue that your bug is about?
Cheers
Antonio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
tag 578099 +confirmed pending
thanks
Hi Philipp,
it seems feasible to me, I will try to include this into 1.5.21-1
Cheers
Antonio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
tag 578087 +confirmed
found 578087 1.5.21-1
thanks
Still reproducible in 1.5.21-1, I will investigate it.
Cheers
Antonio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
tag 578087 +confirmed pending upstream patch
forwarded 578087 http://bugs.mutt.org/3483
thanks
I've created a patch that should fix the problem and forwarded it
upstream, I will include it in the next build (1.5.21-2).
Cheers
Antonio
--- sendlib.c 2010-09-13 17:19:55.0 +
+++
tag 576313 +patch pending confirmed
thanks
Wrapper and news entry to be added in mutt/1.5.21-2 (to go to
experimental).
Cheers
Antonio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
tag 539603 -moreinfo
thanks
I will prepare a backport of 1.5.21-1 so that we have a test scenario
against the latest version released.
Cheers
Antonio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
tag 566076 +confirmed pending
thanks
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:43:49PM +0100, Agustin Martin wrote:
One thing I noticed when evaluating similar suggestion for
dictionaries-common (#566078). You may want to modify that patch to make
sure that '-O UTF-8' is used in the w3m call (mutt upstream
This needs to be re-tested against 1.5.21-1; I will prepare the
backport.
Cheers
Antonio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
found 578583 1.5.21-1
tag 578583 +confirmed pending
thanks
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 10:10:08PM +0100, Marcin Szewczyk wrote:
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 04:31:58PM +, Antonio Radici wrote:
it seems that this bug is not reproducible on 1.5.20-9, I'm therefore
closing this bug, if it's
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 01:57:36AM +0100, Marcin Szewczyk wrote:
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 12:45:22AM +, Antonio Radici wrote:
Hi Marcin,
Hi,
I will prepare a patch to be included in 1.5.21-2 and I'll forward it
upstream.
Actually, the fix ended up to be the same, I have committed
This has just been committed in git, the patch is now called
debian-specific/566076-build_doc_adjustments.patch (attached here for your
convenience); the patch has been renamed to be consistent with our naming scheme
for patches.
Cheers
Antonio
Use w3m to build the txt manual
---
tag 568832 +confirmed upstream
forwarded 568832 http://bugs.mutt.rog/3486
thanks
Confirmed and forwarded upstream.
Cheers
Antonio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
tag 584138 +moreinfo
thanks
Hi Nicholas,
two questions:
1) is this still reproducible with the latest 1.5.21 version uploaded in
experimental?
2) if the answer to (1) is yes, can we get a core file?
Instructions on how to generate and submit a core file are on:
tag 602145 +confirmed upstream
forwarded 602145 http://bugs.mutt.org/3487
thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
forwarded 592874 http://bugs.mutt.org/3489
thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
forwarded 600962 http://bugs.mutt.org/3490
thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
tag 606742 +confirmed upstream
forwarded 606742 http://bugs.mutt.org/3488
thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
forwarded 599136 http://bugs.mutt.org/3491
thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
forwarded 589430 http://bugs.mutt.org/3492
thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
forcemerge 592874 580677
thanks
This sounds like a duplicate of #592874, merging them
Cheers
Antonio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
tag 584138 +confirmed upstream
forwarded 584138 http://bugs.mutt.org/3288
thanks
On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 08:32:15PM +, Nicholas C Piper wrote:
I'm not sure if I can, due to contents. I may have a go, as I know it
would be extremely helpful. Please don't wait for this though (I don't
know
Package: mutt
Version: 1.5.21-1
Severity: normal
These two errors are returned by lintian for 1.5.21:
I: mutt: spelling-error-in-binary ./usr/bin/mutt-org begining beginning
I: mutt: spelling-error-in-binary ./usr/bin/mutt-org dont don't
Cheers
Antonio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
tag 545814 +moreinfo
thanks
Hi Dmitry,
do you mind checking this against the new mutt that is in experimental
(1.5.21-2)? I believe that upstream has implemented new code to fold
headers into 1.5.21.
Let me know if you need a backport for squeeze!
Cheers
Antonio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
tag 572702 +confirmed upstream
forwarded 572702 http://bugs.mutt.org/3495
thanks
Thanks for your bug report, the bug has been forwarded upstream.
Cheers
Antonio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
tag 576973 +unreproducible moreinfo
thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
notfound 576839 1.33-1
tag 576839 +unreproducible moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
are you still able to reproduce this with 1.32? This is certainly not
reproducible on 1.33-1 (which I'm about to upload to experimental).
Cheers
Antonio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
tag 584266 -upstream
tag 584266 +moreinfo
thanks
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 09:38:18AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
I meant to include this information, actually. I have not noticed
this behaviour before, and I deal a lot with the index and encoded
headers. And indeed: -7 is not affected.
Hi
tag 602404 +unreproducible moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
can you please clarify? All files in /etc/default/daemoname have variable
without the $, that's because when you include the file in bash with the .
operator the variables are imported this way.
In the same way you modify path with
export PATH=bla
tag 602404 -unreproducible moreinfo
tag 602404 +confirmed pending
thanks
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 10:57:40PM +0100, Geert Nijpels wrote:
Hello Antonio,
Because the variables have different names they will never be passed
to the daemon startup line.
The init script looks at:
reassign 586327 iproute
thanks
reassigning to iproute as per my previous correspondence.
Cheers
Antonio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
tag 607820 +unreproducible moreinfo
notfound 607820 1.33-1
thanks
Hi,
are you still able to reproduce this against 1.33-1? Also this wasn't
reproducible on the latest 1.32. Can you please verify?
Thanks!
Cheers
Antonio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
tag 581565 +confirmed pending
thanks
Hi Paul,
thanks for your bug report, the exim user experience can definitely
being improved, this will be fixed in the next upload (1.33-2).
Cheers
Antonio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
tag 603186 +confirmed pending
thanks
to be included in 1.5.21-3
Cheers
Antonio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
tag 579967 +confirmed upstream moreinfo
thanks
Hi Helge,
unfortunately exception are only available for RC bugs since we are in
deep freeze so I suppose that we can only integrate this in experimental
(1.5.21-3 is the next release).
Do you mind reviewing the latest de.po from 1.5.21-2 and submit
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 04:53:49PM +0100, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
Do you mind reviewing the latest de.po from 1.5.21-2 and submit your
fixes as a patch? I will also forward the changes upstream.
Yes, I can review the latest de.po. But I'll need a few days for that.
When is the upload to
tag 572361 +wontfix moreinfo
notfound 572361 1.5.20-7
thanks
Hi,
this doesn't look to me as a bug, ^G is useful to exit any prompt in
mutt and this is explained in the manual; there are other keys that
along with CTRL can be used to control other aspect of mutt (for example
^L redraw the window)
Source: tokyocabinet
Version: 1.4.37-6
Severity: normal
Hi Pierre,
mutt (standard) is currently depending on tokyocabinet (extra) and we
have filled a bug to ftp.debian.org to switch the priority of
tokyocabinet from extra to standard; that was accepted and resolved
(FYI, bug # is 588607).
It
reopen 576313
thanks
Hi Jonathan,
this sounds more than reasonable, let's reopen and I'll try to fix again
this for 1.5.21-3; sorry for the inconvenience.
Cheers
Antonio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 11:47:39PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
feel free to NMU, and IIRC tokyocabinet is in collab-maint, if it isn't,
it's something that ought to be fixed :)
Hi Pierre,
thanks for your quick response, I will prepare the NMU this weekend.
Cheers
Antonio
--
To
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 01:42:23PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Seems that #441069 was about the same problem.
So, I've been bitten by this twice now. postgrey should not break
this badly when libdb is upgraded. If it's going to remain this crashy,
I will need to find some other greylister.
Hi
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 03:26:32PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 01:54:11 +, Antonio Radici wrote:
Please ignore my last correspondence, it seems that my upload keeps
having problems, I will recreate teh package and re-upload it (I hope
for the last time
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 08:11:07PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sat, 2010-12-18 at 17:54 +, Antonio Radici wrote:
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 03:26:32PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 01:54:11 +, Antonio Radici wrote:
Please ignore my last correspondence
On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 07:20:20AM -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
The patch below is what I'm running.
Hi James,
thanks for the patch, I will integrate it and release later on today,
let's see if it improves the situation for Joey and anyone else who is
experiencing the problem.
Cheers
Antonio
tag 617472 +moreinfo
thanks
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 07:34:03AM +0100, Francois Mescam wrote:
Package: postgrey
Version: 1.32-6.1
Severity: important
Since 3 or 4 days postgrey crash one or two times per day with the
above error in the subject. In the log just before crash I found these
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 09:20:41AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 06:47:47 +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
Crap. Yet another victim of this bug in mutt (I guess this is a bug in
mutt, I'm not sure of this), which I try to
severity 602404 grave
severity 605044 grave
thanks
Hi,
I'm raising the severity of those two bugs to grave because, despite being fixed
in experimental, they should also be fixed in squeeze, the rationale is that
/etc/default/cfengine3 is unusable so the user cannot specify any option to
start
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 02:35:04PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
That doesn't sound grave to me. Just because you have to modify
/etc/init.d/cfengine3 instead of /etc/default/cfengine3 doesn't make the
package unusable, does it?
Hi Julien,
thanks for your quick answer; I thought this could be
severity 602404 important
severity 605044 important
reopen 605044
reopen 602404
thanks
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 03:20:36PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
[snip]
Then set it back to important, and fix it in 6.0.1 if you like.
OK!
Cheers
Antonio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package mutt 1.5.20-9+squeeze1, it resolves grave bug #537061.
More context is in http://bugs.debian.org/537061, basically the patch included
in this version won't let mutt
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 01:19:34PM +0100, yellow wrote:
Package: mutt
Version: 1.5.20-5
Severity: normal
Hello,
Why critical? - Because it is simply not possible to send emails with added
attachements. - So not working for its purpose of mutt.
What is mutt for? - Sending emails
[I
tag 553321 +confirmed pending
forwarded 553321 http://bugs.mutt.org/3371
thanks
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 03:08:01AM -0500, James Vega wrote:
It looks like this is a weird interaction between the terminal size,
mutt, and 1 line from the build log. This only happens when running
mutt in a
forwarded 553238 http://bugs.mutt.org/3372
thanks
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 07:19:43PM +0100, Jonathan Neuschäfer wrote:
No undeleted messages. should be translated as Keine weiteren ungelöschten
Nachrichten. instead of Alle Nachrichten gelöscht..
Thanks for your report and sorry for the late
Hi,
time_inc is now 250 in the git repo, this will be the Debian default from the
next release.
Cheers
Antonio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
tag 556143 +moreinfo
thanks
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 10:36:32PM +0100, Tanguy Ortolo wrote:
Hello,
Attached is an mbox containing a – modified to anonymize it – bounce
message I have received from a brain-dead mail server. Even if no server
should send such horrible messages, some do, and
bts tag 549278 +confirmed upstream
forwarded 549278 http://bugs.mutt.org/3373
thanks
Hi,
thanks for your bug report, the bug was forwarded upstream.
Cheers
Antonio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
tag 557978 +confirmed wontfix
thanks
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 05:54:19PM +0100, Alessandro Rubini wrote:
Package: mutt
Version: 1.5.18-6
git generates long message-id fields and my mutt wraps them
when I use it to send my patches in Lenny.
Since the last argument to mutt_write_one_header
tag 562852 +moreinfo
thanks
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 03:28:40PM +0100, Gernot Salzer wrote:
- I open a message containing a PGP MESSAGE
- I press Esc P
- Mutt says: Enter PGP passphrase:
- I enter my password
- Mutt says: Enter S/MIME passphrase:
- I press Enter since S/MIME is not set up.
tag 557395 +confirmed upstream pending
forwarded 557395 http://bugs.mutt.org/3374
thanks
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 01:21:22PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
[...]
The documentation for crypto_verify_sig in the muttrc manual page has
some man formatting errors. It has a visible \Fi right before the
tag 565236 +unreproducible moreinfo
notfound 565236 1.5.20-6
thanks
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 05:36:42PM -0800, Bill Brelsford wrote:
Package: mutt
Version: 1.5.20-5
Severity: normal
After the commands
set realname=bar
reply-hook . set realname=foo
replying to a message
tag 552149 +confirmed upstream
forwarded 552149 http://bugs.mutt.org/3375
thanks
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:38:34AM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
Package: mutt
Version: 1.5.20-4
Severity: wishlist
I often want to attach several files to a mail. It would help if mutt
supported globbing in
tag 537877 +unreproducible moreinfo
notfound 537877 1.5.20-4
thanks
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 04:02:49PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Hello Maintainer,
I am using courier-imap since 9 years now and had never problems using
mutt. But now, exactly since Etch, there is a problem.
As you
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 01:49:38AM +0100, Friedrich Delgado Friedrichs wrote:
It's November 21 2009 now, Bug is still present in mutt-1.5.20-4.
expect a new version to hit unstable today.
Cheers
Antonio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 08:13:23PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
Package: mutt
Version: 1.5.20-4
Severity: wishlist
Would it be possible to package a new -dev version of mutt, and if
only for [0] (see discussion [1])?
Thanks,
Hi Martin,
sorry for being late in packaging mutt lately
On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 04:04:04PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 21:34:22 +, Antonio Radici wrote:
Hi Julien,
I'm sorry but this was my mistake, I missed a file in the patch; the
bugfix for this will be included in the next release (it is already in
git
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 10:28:27AM +, b...@bc-bd.org wrote:
Hi,
updated the patch for 1.5.20-5.
Can we please get this included/upstream? I don't want to maintain yet another
patched debian package.
regards
Stefan
Yes, sorry, I had to do this urgent upload of mutt because
1 - 100 of 745 matches
Mail list logo