regards,
Paul
# Dutch translation of the Debian reference card
# Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
# This file is distributed under the same license as the refcard package.
# Corien Prins [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2005
# Paul Gevers [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2008
#
msgid
msgstr
Project-Id
Just for the record, reading on the blog of upstream [1] it looks like
upstream is dead. Bugs don't get fixes and no new (already promised)
versions.
[1] http://plasticbugs.com/?p=361#comments
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
regards,
Paul
# translation of daptup_0.7.1_nl.po to Dutch
# Copyright (C) 2008 Eugene V. Lyubimkin
# This file is distributed under the same license as the daptup package.
#
# Paul Gevers [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2008.
msgid
msgstr
Project-Id-Version: daptup_0.7.1_nl\n
Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: [EMAIL
-n '(gettext)Header Entry'
#
#Some information specific to po-debconf are available at
#/usr/share/doc/po-debconf/README-trans
# or http://www.debian.org/intl/l10n/po-debconf/README-trans
#
#Developers do not need to manually edit POT or PO files.
#
# Paul Gevers [EMAIL
files.
#
#
# This is an unofficial translation
#
# Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2004.
# Kurt De Bree [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2006.
# Paul Gevers [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2008.
msgid
msgstr
Project-Id-Version: foomatic-filters_3.0.2-20080211-3.2_nl\n
Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
POT-Creation-Date
]
With kind regards,
Paul
# translation of grub2_1.96+20080724-10_nl.po to Dutch
# Copyright (C) 2008 THE PACKAGE'S COPYRIGHT HOLDER
# This file is distributed under the same license as the grub2 package.
#
# Paul Gevers [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2008.
msgid
msgstr
Project-Id-Version: grub2_1.96+20080724-10_nl\n
-debconf/README-trans#
#Developers do not need to manually edit POT or PO files.
#
# Paul Gevers [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2008.
msgid
msgstr
Project-Id-Version: xawtv_3.95.dfsg.1-8_nl\n
Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
POT-Creation-Date: 2007-10-25 07:29+0200\n
PO-Revision-Date: 2008-09-24 21:36
unnecessary) changes in the Makefiles.
+ A README.source should be added to explain the use of the patch
system.
With kind regards,
Paul Gevers
[1]
http://lintian.debian.org/reports/maintainer/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[2] http://mantis.freepascal.org/view.php?id=12201
signature.asc
Description
'(gettext)Header Entry'
#
#Some information specific to po-debconf are available at
#/usr/share/doc/po-debconf/README-trans
# or http://www.debian.org/intl/l10n/po-debconf/README-trans
#
#Developers do not need to manually edit POT or PO files.
#
# Paul Gevers [EMAIL PROTECTED
-debconf/README-trans#
#Developers do not need to manually edit POT or PO files.
#
# Paul Gevers [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2008.
msgid
msgstr
Project-Id-Version: openslp-dfsg_1.2.1-7.4_nl\n
Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
POT-Creation-Date: 2008-04-25 08:04+0200\n
PO-Revision-Date: 2008-09-26
'
# info -n '(gettext)Header Entry'
#
#Some information specific to po-debconf are available at
#/usr/share/doc/po-debconf/README-trans
# or http://www.debian.org/intl/l10n/po-debconf/README-trans
#
#Developers do not need to manually edit POT or PO files.
#
# Paul Gevers
-debconf/README-trans
#Developers do not need to manually edit POT or PO files.
#
# Kurt De Bree kdebree(AT)telenet(DOT)be, 2006.
# Paul Gevers [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2008.
msgid
msgstr
Project-Id-Version: foomatic-gui_0.7.8_nl\n
Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
POT-Creation-Date: 2007-05-30
'(gettext)Header Entry'
#
#Some information specific to po-debconf are available at
#/usr/share/doc/po-debconf/README-trans
# or http://www.debian.org/intl/l10n/po-debconf/README-trans
#
#Developers do not need to manually edit POT or PO files.
#
# Paul Gevers [EMAIL
/l10n/po-debconf/README-trans#
#Developers do not need to manually edit POT or PO files.
#
# Paul Gevers [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2008.
msgid
msgstr
Project-Id-Version: fdutils_5.5-20060227-2.1_nl\n
Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
POT-Creation-Date: 2008-01-09 21:08+0100\n
PO-Revision-Date
Hello Norbert,
Just back from the mountains myself.
Norbert Preining wrote:
Hi Paul,
quick reply, I am half a day off the mountains,
On Di, 15 Jul 2008, Paul Gevers wrote:
I am currently working on packaging the MiKTeX-tools for Debian, which
consists mainly of a LaTeX package manager
tags wontfix
thanks
Avidemux is present at debian-multimedia.org and probably there with reason.
With kind regards,
Paul
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
While I am still awaiting comments and sponsorship I like to note here
that the package source is already available at [1] for some time.
With kind regards,
Paul
[1] http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/winff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Package: lazarus-ide
Version: 0.9.24-0-9
At this moment lazarus seems uninstallable because it depends on
fpc-abi-2.2. This pseudo package is not available. Probably lazarus-ide
should depend on fpc-abi-2.2.2 because that is supplied by fp-units-rtl.
Below the output of install and package info
]
With kind regards,
Paul
# translation of bind9_1:9.5.0.dfsg.P2-1_nl.po to Dutch
# translation of bind9 debconf template to Dutch
# Copyright (C) 2008 THE PACKAGE'S COPYRIGHT HOLDER
# This file is distributed under the same license as the bind9 package.
#
# Paul Gevers [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2008
'
# info -n '(gettext)Header Entry'
#
#Some information specific to po-debconf are available at
#/usr/share/doc/po-debconf/README-trans
# or http://www.debian.org/intl/l10n/po-debconf/README-trans
#
#Developers do not need to manually edit POT or PO files.
#
# Paul Gevers [EMAIL
I am not sure if I am doing things with these files which I am not
supposed to do (I use Ubuntu/Hardy lintian on my sid package), but I get
the following output. It look to me that find errors are a bug? I put in
one instance each file on a new line (with the first line empty after
Files:, might
Just for the record of this bug: I made a QA package which fixes this
bug. It is available for checking/suggestions at mentors.d.n [1].
Paul
[1]http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/maintainer-packages?action=details;package=ssystem
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
* URL : http://www.miek.nl/projects/rdup/
This URL does not work. The real URL is http://miek.nl/projects/rdup/
With kind regards,
Paul
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Paul Gevers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As my first contribution to Debian I intend to package the MiKTeX tools
from Christian Schenks MiKTeX project.
* Package name : miktex-tools
Version : 2.7.2960
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Paul Gevers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name : libmiktex207-2.7.2960
Version : 2.7.2960
Upstream Author : Christian Schenk
* URL : http://miktex.org/unx
* License : GNU General Public Licence, Other/Proprietary
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Paul Gevers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I intend to package winFF, a GUI batch converter for FFmpeg.
* Package name : winff
Version : 0.4.1
Upstream Author : Matthew Weatherford
* URL : http://www.winff.org
* License : GNU
As a matter of fact, I have.
I have asked the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mail list about advice on the libraries
[1][2] with some off-list communication. As a result of those responses
I decided to first get some experience with packaging by packaging
something smaller (and without libraries). I
Running on an other computer (Ubuntu 7.10) I have the same problem, so
it looks like upstream may be interested?
The problem:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/temp $ tar --diff --file test.tar
tar: hoekro.gif: Warning: Cannot stat: No such file or directory
For my Ubuntu system:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/ $ dpkg
-13etch5
With kind regards,
Paul Gevers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: cacti
Version: 0.8.7b-2.1
Followup-For: Bug #508616
I am installing on a new server, so this is a clean install, but during
the configuration I mentioned that I would use my old database. After
the installation I uploaded my cacti information from a server running
etch. After the
Package: python2.5
Version: 2.5.2-15
Severity: normal
The problem manifests itself with mailman, the problem is in python.
Fast test:
p...@elbrus ~ $ python -c 'print a' | head -n0
close failed: [Errno 32] Broken pipe
Complete problem:
When I start mailman with /etc/init.d/mailman start I get:
Package: zope2.10
Version: 2.10.6-1
Severity: minor
The /etc/init.d/zope2.10 file mentions (trice) zope2.9 instead of zope2.10 in
the LSBInitScript header.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.1
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel:
Come to think of it, maybe you want to provide zope instead of zope2.X
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
help me motivate for
the upcoming issues. (I don't want to sound whining thou).
With kind regards
Paul Gevers
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=522157
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
Package: cacti
Version: 0.8.7b-2.1
Followup-For: Bug #508616
My previous comment is partially invalid. The problem was that the previous
server was 32bit and the current version is 64bit. After using rrdtool to dump
and restore the data on the corresponding systems everything was fine.
Kind
Package: lintian
Version: 2.2.17
Severity: wishlist
In my packages I put the description of patches according to DEP-3 [1].
It would be nice if lintian would not complain about
dpatch-missing-description when the fields described by DEP-3 are
available instead of the ## DP: lines.
Paul
[1]
I assume from that that dpatch supports DEP-3 and doesn't get confused by
comments not using that prefix?
The patches apply cleanly. So I assume, yes. Header is maintained by
dpatch-edit-patch when the @DPATCH@ tag is found (according to it's own
comments).
Paul
signature.asc
Description:
The operation that I'd want to be sure to test is modifying the patch
and regenerating it and being sure that dpatch retained the comments
rather than rewriting the header and losing them.
Just did that and no problem.
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
reassign 545672 lesstif2
forwarded 545672
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=1637320group_id=8596atid=108596
thanks
This bug is most likely cause by the lesstif library, therefor I
reassign it there. Are you by any chance running on a KDE system? I have
heared that the under the
Package: nedit-dbg
Version: 1:5.6~cvs20081118-6
Tags: pending confirmed
The recently created nedit-dbg package does not contain the stripped
symbols from the nedit package. In the rules file the line
dh_strip
should be replaced with
dh_strip --dbg-package=nedit-dbg
Paul
signature.asc
information specific to po-debconf are available at
# /usr/share/doc/po-debconf/README-trans
# or http://www.debian.org/intl/l10n/po-debconf/README-trans
# Developers do not need to manually edit POT or PO files.
#
# Paul Gevers p...@climbing.nl, 2009-2010.
msgid
msgstr
Project-Id-Version: clamav
I believe the packaging is (nearly) done.
It can be found in the pkg-a11y git repository [1].
[1] http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-a11y/daisy-player.git;a=summary
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
...@lists.debian.org
With kind regards,
Paul
# translation of grub2.pot to Dutch
# Copyright (C) 2008-2010 THE PACKAGE'S COPYRIGHT HOLDER
# This file is distributed under the same license as the grub2 package.
#
# Paul Gevers p...@climbing.nl, 2008-2010.
msgid
msgstr
Project-Id-Version: grub2_1.96
Package: fp-units-gfx
Version: 2.4.0-2
Severity: normal
This bug was reported to the Ubuntu bugtracker [1]. It seems to me a
valid issue, that should be fixed in Debian.
To use graph unit included in fp-units-gfx package you need svgalib1 and
svgali1-dev.
Please add it to dependencies of
Package: fp-docs
Version: 2.2.2-4
Severity: minor
Thanks
The long description of the package says (last line):
This package contains the documentation for the Free Pascal Compiler.
The documentation is available in HTML and in PDF.
However, the package does not contain any PDF format files.
I will fix this issue by changing the description of the package
unless someone judges that PDF files are also worth to be packaged.
Solution is fine with me.
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: fpc
Version: 2.2.0-dfsg1-9
Version: 2.0.0-4
Severity: serious
Thanks
As can be read in the changelog of the latest version the old source of
fpc has a copyright infringment:
- Possible CodeGear Copyright infringements in the source were reworked
using cleanroom approach.
Following the
that they took it very seriously.
Paul
[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fpc/+bug/275688
Original Message
Subject: Bug#506977: FPC: copyright infringement in pre 2.2.2 sources
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 10:42:13 -0600
From: Paul Gevers
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: fpc
Version
Dear FTP-masters,
Please have a look at bug 506977 (of which the last and most explaining
comment is below this email). The issue involved is a copyright
infringement in the source of fpc before version 2.2.2 (i.e. everything
version except for the one in unstable). I fear that we should either
In Ubuntu I checked that the following packages builddepend on FPC:
lazarus
imapcopy
hedgewars
libhdate
gearhead
m-tx
python-soappy
poker-network
I assume, but have not check yet, that the same goes for Debian.
Looks like quite a lot of packages seem to have go. The removal request
Package: lazarus-ide
Version: 0.9.28.2-7
Severity: grave
fpc was updated two days ago. Now, lazarus is uninstallable because it
depends on the fpc-abi-2.2.4+fcl240 package which doesn't exist in
unstable anymore.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Updated Portuguese translation for winff messages.
Translator: Américo Monteiro a_monteiro at netcabo.pt
Feel free to use it.
For translation updates please contact 'Last Translator' or the
Portuguese Translation Team traduz at debianpt.org.
Great thanks. However, upstream has included
'(gettext)Header Entry'
#
#Some information specific to po-debconf are available at
#/usr/share/doc/po-debconf/README-trans
# or http://www.debian.org/intl/l10n/po-debconf/README-trans
#
#Developers do not need to manually edit POT or PO files.
#
# Paul Gevers [EMAIL PROTECTED
-debconf/README-trans
#
#Developers do not need to manually edit POT or PO files.
#
# Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2005.
# Paul Gevers [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2008.
msgid
msgstr
Project-Id-Version: calamaris 2.59-4\n
Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
POT-Creation-Date: 2008-01-02 08:21+0100\n
/README-trans
#
#Developers do not need to manually edit POT or PO files.
#
# Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2004.
# Paul Gevers [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2008.
msgid
msgstr
Project-Id-Version: backuppc 2.0.2-2\n
Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
POT-Creation-Date: 2008-10-12 12:34+0200\n
PO
/README-trans
#
#Developers do not need to manually edit POT or PO files.
#
# Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2005.
# Paul Gevers [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2008.
msgid
msgstr
Project-Id-Version: bindgraph 0.1-2\n
Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
POT-Creation-Date: 2008-05-10 14:39+0200\n
PO
I suspect this is some really trivial misunderstanding, however, the
manpage definitely implies this is possible.
In the Ubuntu bug tracker there is a patch available for the man page,
as that is what is wrong: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501729
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
Package: fpc
Version: 2.2.4-5
Severity: normal
I compiled fpc 2.2.4-5 for Ubuntu Karmic (see
https://launchpad.net/~paul-climbing/+archive/ppa/)
but upon updating I saw that fp-units-multimedia was not able to install because
it tried to overwrite files owned by (the old version of)
Package: apache2.2-common
Version: 2.2.9-10+lenny6
Severity: normal
Not 100% sure if this is not caused by my set-up, but when I add a
new directory via webdav with the name of an existing file with the
extention subtracted, I get a 405 response. For example:
p...@xxx /var/www/a/directory/test $
I am looking into creating a security update for Lenny for this bug.
However, the original patch is not available anymore (404 error: Not
Found). Does anybody know where to find the patch or an equivalent one?
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
This bug is not an issue in the binary build since 3.1.1-1, because the
prototype.js is not used. Instead the package depends on libjs-prototype
and replaces the file with a link. See bug 475286.
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
If I look at your screenshot, I see the line with the filename and
filesize, which is not present in my out-of-the-box nedit. How did you
get that to appear? In other words, I can not reproduce your problem
yet, and suspect that it MIGHT be related to personal settings. In order
to find out, it
[No need to e-mail explicit to me, I receive the bug-reports anyway.]
The problem is reproducible without this statistics line.
Just open nedit, and use file-new to generate a couple of tabs.
Then change between the tabs several times; each time you change
tabs, the bar consumes more
]
With kind regards,
Paul
# translation of grub2_1.96+20081005-1_nl.po to Dutch
# Copyright (C) 2008 THE PACKAGE'S COPYRIGHT HOLDER
# This file is distributed under the same license as the grub2 package.
#
# Paul Gevers [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2008.
msgid
msgstr
Project-Id-Version: grub2_1.96+20081005-1_nl\n
Package: archmbox
Version: 4.9.0-1
Severity: wishlist
Thanks
There is a new version available at upstream
http://adc-archmbox.sourceforge.net/
Kind regards
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: archivemail
Severity: wishlist
Thanks
It would be nice if you could remove/delete attachments from old mails.
I am maintainer of a site with a lot of mail-list archives, but some
lists have used it heavily to exchange large documents that I would like
to strip from the mbox if they are
Hello Yann,
I ran into bug 491017 [1] (Synopsis orphaned). I was thinking about
looking into this, but it looks like you actively maintain this package
in experimental. Maybe worth noting in the bug report?
Kind regards,
Paul
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=491017
If you use vrfy -f without an explicit filename you can type the
address on the command line.
Please confirm that this is a solution to your (old) problem.
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Just for the record, via IRC (#debian-bugs) I had somebody with a
powerpc test winff and he got the following result. So I think it has to
do with the architecture. One remark (I don't know how to test this
without uploading a new version): I didn't include the ${misc:Depends}
in the Depends field
Hello all,
Probably a stupid question, but anyway, I have a question regarding mime
support. In my package I use the icon-generic field, but this field has
only be included in shared-mime-info version 0.40. Should I ask
debian-devel if it is ok to pre-depend on shared-mime-info (= 0.40) or
is
Hi Tomáš
Please run apt-get source winff in a directory where you want to have
the source. Then, in that directory, change debian/control to include
${misc:Depends} in the depends line, i.e. it should read:
Depends: ffmpeg, xterm | x-terminal-emulator, ${shlibs:Depends},
${misc:Depends}
Now,
tag 123276 moreinfo
thanks
I am currently running through old bugs of nedit. Could you please tell
me if this bug is still present in the latest version: 1:5.5-3?
Kind regards,
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
tag 308635 moreinfo
thanks
I am currently running through old bugs of nedit. Could you please tell
me if this bug is still present in the latest version: 1:5.5-3?
Kind regards,
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
tags 515035 upstream
thanks
Mazen, can you please provide a link to the upstream bug, I could not
find it in their bugtracker?
Kind regards,
Paul
Mazen NEIFER wrote:
Issue forwarded upstream
Cheers,
Mazen,
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
It's now been over two years since the last response from the former
maintainer (?), and the bug is still present in Lenny. What does the
time line look like for a fix?
Upstream is (slowly) working on a maintainer release. I am adopting
nedit and have a beta of the new upstream release
tags 510157 + wontfix
It seems that you are running a version of ffmpeg from experimental, or
self-compiled, please read the /usr/share/doc/winff/README.Debian file.
The current version of the presets in winff *should* work with the
unstable version of ffmpeg. More specifically, the presets
Package: winff
Version: 1.0.2-1
Severity: whishlist
Tags: pending
The language/winff.po should be linked by language/winff.en.po to ensure
language selection to English.
See: http://www.biggmatt.com/forums/index.php?topic=391.0
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
tags 530765 +pending
severity minor
thanks
Thanks for reporting this issue. I have the fix ready, and will
incorporate it with the next upload.
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
notfound 415539 1:0.95.0-2.3
thanks
Going through the bugs of lesstif2, I was wondering if this particular
bug is still an issue. I can not reproduce it with my version of
lesstif2 and xpdf.
Kind regards,
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
A fix for this copy/paste bug was probably included in the previous
upload of lesstif (version 1:0.95.0-2.3).
At least from the looks of the nedit bug tracker [1], this really looks
like the same bug, indeed a 64bit issue. The patch is applied in Debian now.
Can somebody please check, I don't
The inversed scroll buttons bug reported in ddd is probably fixed by the
latest update of lesstif2.
Maybe somebody can test and comment (and ultimately close this bug).
With kind regards,
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
NEdit doesn't support two-keys accented characters (such as ê, ï, â,
etc.) in any tab except the first one.
- In the first tab all is OK, every French accented characters are
supported: é, è, ê, à, â, î, ï.
- In any extra tab, the following accented characters can not be typed:
ê, â, î, ï.
Hi,
Version 0.95.0-2.3 includes several 64 bit issue fixes. Could you please
test if this bug is still valid? I don't have a 64 bit machine
available, or I would have tested myself.
With kind regards,
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: debian-maintainers
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Please accept my application as Debian Maintainer.
I have attached a jetring changeset.
With kind regards,
Paul
Comment: Add Paul Gevers p...@climbing.nl as a Debian Maintainer
Date: Sat, 08 May 2010 10:48:30 +0200
Action: import
On 05/08/10 16:07, Enrico Zini wrote:
On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 11:00:12AM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
Please accept my application as Debian Maintainer.
I have attached a jetring changeset.
it looks like you don't have any DD signatures on your key. Could you
please get at least 2 of them
I couldn't find any explanation to this crash in the logs. I've purged
my configuration, re-installed it from scratch and never managed to
reproduce it. If it still happens, maybe I can provide you an
executable with debug symbols so you can give a usable call-trace.
I think you have fixed
Package: lazarus-ide
Version: 0.9.28.2-7
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Lazarus-ide has a potential memory leak, which is fixed upstream with
the attached patch. Winff could not run in Ubuntu due to this. (I don't
understand why it was not a problem in Debian).
Ubuntu bug for Winff with the
Package: lazarus-ide
Version: 0.9.28.2-7
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Find attached a patch that avoids trapping some FPU exceptions, since C
code handles them differently, or that the CPU exception flag is
leftover from the C library function call which C code wouldn't bother
but FPC needs it
tags 577347 pending
thanks
The source of lazarus changed the packaging and moved the winff
build-dependency executable lazbuild into lcl-utils.
Thanks for reporting (looking into whether this was necessary was
planned shortly anyway).
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
tags 576095 wontfix
thanks
I lack the skill and time to support such a patch, as I understand it is
far from finished. Unfortunately upstream does not seem to be interested
to implement UTF-8 because heavy rewriting is needed.
See for instance:
Package: python-mode
Version: 1:1.0-3.1
Severity: normal
On systems only running emacs22 the package python-mode is not
installable. Apart from the warning:
!! File /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/python-mode/python-mode.el uses
old-style backquotes !!
the python mode seems to work fine.
--
fixed 523626 1:5.1.0-1
thanks
I was a little bit too quick with this bug report. The current version
in testing already fixed this bug.
Sorry for the noise.
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
Currently I am working on packaging daisy-player (ITP 595292). My
intended description of the package is below. Could somebody please
comment how they receive the description?
Thanks
Paul
Description: player for Daisy talking books (DTB)
Daisy-player is a command line player for talking
information specific to po-debconf are available at
#/usr/share/doc/po-debconf/README-trans
# or http://www.debian.org/intl/l10n/po-debconf/README-trans
#
#Developers do not need to manually edit POT or PO files.
#
# Luk Claes luk.cl...@ugent.be, 2005
# Paul Gevers p...@climbing.nl
Hi all,
With upstream of daisy-player (ITP: #595292) I am working on getting a
Daisy player for Daisy talking books into good shape. I am having
concerns about the current hack of upstream to ensure the program is
able to read from a cd. The upstream source contains one udev rule to
create a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Paul Gevers p...@climbing.nl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: daisy-player
Version : 4.0.2
Upstream Author : Jos Lemmens j...@jlemmens.nl
* URL : http://web.inter.nl.net/users/lemmensj/
* License
I have an Ubuntu package in progress in my Launchpad PPA:
https://launchpad.net/~paul-climbing/+archive/daisy
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Upstream is now using udisks to mount the cd-rom in his version 5.0.
Because he wants to use madplay options -s, -t, and -o, he is currently
building his own madplay, which of course is unacceptable for Debian. I
am discussing the possibilities with him.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
Upstream created a new version of daisy-player, version 5.2, which moved
away from udev, and uses udisks. Upstream does not compile it's own
version of madplay anymore, so that issue is solved.
I updated my packaging in my ppa and in the GIT repository. I will have
some people test the package
I tried a couple of more programs (ones which I normally do not use), and I
found that there are several other programs besides nedit that have the same
problem, for instance xpaint (2.9.1.4-1), xfig (1:3.2.5.b-1+b1) and xmgrace
(1:5.1.22-8), and the problem occurs (mainly) at the sliders at
1 - 100 of 8102 matches
Mail list logo
