Bug#1057431: fakeupstream.cgi: add support for static.rust-lang.org

Hi Zixing, The newest stable upstream release is advertised in more than one way allowing to write regular debian/watch files. Here below I give two working examples. | version=4 | https://forge.rust-lang.org/infra/other-installation-methods.html#source-code \ |

Bug#1057431: fakeupstream.cgi: add support for static.rust-lang.org

Hello Zixing Liu, Can I view an example of a package in Debian that can be watched with such extension of fakeupstream? The link https://static.rust-lang.org/dist displays an error in xml format. A real example would help me understand the context. Ciao, Bart On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at

Bug#1039563: qa.debian.org: Procedure needed to report mishandled bug reports

On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 10:30:53AM +0200, debbug@sideload.33mail.com wrote: > Debian bugs are mishandled too often, which suggests there is no > oversight of mishandled cases. I have an example at hand: > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1026922 > > A valid, credible bug

Bug#1033632: [External] Debian Bug #1033632 - SourceForge RSS feed rate limit

On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 12:15:56AM +, Paul Wise wrote: > There are some improvements that we could make to QA services: > >  * pass on HTTP error codes from services fakeupstream.cgi accesses >  * switch fakeupstream.cgi SourceForge support to using the RSS feed >  * switch

Bug#1011669: ITP: gnucobol -- COBOL compiler

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Bart Martens * Package name: gnucobol Version : 3.1.2 Upstream Author : Roger While, Keisuke Nishida * URL : https://www.gnu.org/software/gnucobol/ * License : GPL, LGPL Programming Lang: C Description : COBOL

Bug#984729: libgtk builds fine in bullseye

Control: tag -1 + moreinfo unreproducible Control: severity -1 normal Control: notfound -1 3.24.24-3 Hi ZenWalker, I have today successfully built this package in bullseye, on my amd64 (pbuilder) and on tests.reproducible-builds.org.

Bug#983314: linux-base: perf fails to report that linux-perf-5.10 is not installed

Package: linux-base Version: 4.6 Severity: minor File: /usr/bin/perf Observed behavior: $ perf /usr/bin/perf: line 13: exec: perf_5.10: not found Expected behavior: $ perf /usr/bin/perf: line 14: exec: perf_5.10: not found E: linux-perf-5.10 is not installed.

Bug#980607: netcfg: FTBFS patches

Dennis, Cyril, Downloading the patches from the bts works fine. The patches can be applied with ignoring whitespaces (option -l). The patches solve the FTBFS. | (sid)bartm@carolus:~/src/sponsoring/netcfg-1.169$ patch -l -p1 < ../netcfg_1.169-fix-CheckAPI.patch | patching file

Bug#983161: installation-reports: Acer A515-56G-71RB NX.A1MEH.002

On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 12:02:52PM +0100, Vincent Blut wrote: > Hi Bart, > > Le 2021-02-20 09:32, Bart Martens a écrit : > > Package: installation-reports > > > > Boot method: usb stick > > Image version: firmware-bullseye-DI-alpha3-amd64-netinst.iso > > D

Bug#983161: installation-reports: Acer A515-56G-71RB NX.A1MEH.002

Package: installation-reports Boot method: usb stick Image version: firmware-bullseye-DI-alpha3-amd64-netinst.iso Date: 20 feb 2021 Machine: Acer A515-56G-71RB NX.A1MEH.002 Processor: intel i7-1165G7 quad-core Memory: 16 GB DDR4 SDRAM Partitions: df -Tl Filesystem Type 1K-blocks

Bug#928099: publishing private e-mail

th privately or publicly, and never says thing > that you will regret later, or say it publicly. Especially we are > discussing public matters, that affects the public and all authors. > > Such decision should not be conducted behind close doors. > > > On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 7:45

Bug#923636: RFS: jag/0.3.5-4 -- arcade and puzzle 2D game

On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 08:09:17PM -0300, Carlos Donizete Froes wrote: > Hi Bart, > > > Are you aware that the file debian/not-installed was added? I doubt that > > this > > was intentional. > > I do not know if you can help me, but when I go to debuild[1] my package, > this warning > occurs.

Bug#923636: RFS: jag/0.3.5-4 -- arcade and puzzle 2D game

Hi Carlos, About this package at mentors: Version:0.3.5-4 Uploaded: 2019-03-03 08:05 Source package: https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/j/jag/jag_0.3.5-4.dsc Are you aware that the file debian/not-installed was added? I doubt that this was intentional. |

Bug#923670: RM: cmdpack -- ROM; low popcon and no longer maintained

Package: ftp.debian.org

Bug#923671: RM: empty-expect -- ROM; low popcon and no longer maintained

Package: ftp.debian.org

Bug#923672: RM: libcgic -- ROM; low popcon and no longer maintained

Package: ftp.debian.org

Bug#923669: RM: gmorgan -- ROM; low popcon and no longer maintained

Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: wishlist Hi, I suggest removing gmorgan. I added it in Debian, orphaned it years ago, and nobody picks it up. I doubt anyone cares keeping this in Debian. Cheers, Bart

Bug#923039: RFS: dayon

Hi, building the .deb with mvn is not sufficient for a package to enter Debian I'm afraid. The best I can advise at this point is to do some more reading and try to make a source package that is accessible for mentors/sponsors here with a .dsc file. Let's start with that and see where to go from

Bug#921482: RFS: note/1.3.26-3

About this package at mentors: Version:1.3.26-3 Uploaded: 2019-02-16 01:38 Source package: https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/note/note_1.3.26-3.dsc In debian/patches/fix-spelling.patch some spelling fixes got removed, I guess accidentally. For example

Bug#922993: RFS: popout3d/1.5.0-1

It's there now. With version 1.5.0. Shouldn't that be 1.5.0-1? https://mentors.debian.net/package/popout3d

Bug#922993: RFS: popout3d

It's not at mentors at this time. Can you upload it there?

Bug#921586: RFS: pymacs/0.25-1.2 [ITA]

Hi Emmanuel, Good to see you want to adopt this package. However, the version ending with -1.2 seems meant for a non-maintainer upload. Any specific reason for using an non-maintainer upload version number here? Cheers, Bart

Bug#921403: RFS: pyfltk/1.3.4.1-1 [ITP]

Hi Robert, This package has been removed from Debian some time ago. Are you sure that bringing it back has good value? https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=870935 Also, there should be an ITP (not to be confused with an RFS with [ITA]). Cheers, Bart

Bug#854590: einstein upstream

Looking at the commits, it just follows debian.

Bug#914730: missing itp

Hello, For packages not yet in debian, there must be an ITP as meant here: https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch05.en.html#newpackage Cheers, Bart

Bug#918489: O: grdesktop -- GNOME frontend for the rdesktop client

Package: wnpp Severity: normal

Bug#918490: O: empty-expect -- Run processes and applications under pseudo-terminal

Package: wnpp Severity: normal

Bug#918488: O: pepperflashplugin-nonfree -- pepper flash installer package

Package: wnpp Severity: normal

Bug#918487: O: libio-lockedfile-perl -- IO::LockedFile Class - supply object methods for locking files

Package: wnpp Severity: normal

Bug#918486: O: num-utils -- dealing with numbers on command line

Package: wnpp Severity: normal

Bug#918485: O: freedroidrpg -- rpg game influenced by paradroid

Package: wnpp Severity: normal

Bug#918484: O: cmdpack -- cd image compress

Package: wnpp Severity: normal

Bug#918482: O: flashplugin-nonfree -- installer package for adobe flash player

Package: wnpp Severity: normal

Bug#918483: O: cairo-clock -- Analog clock drawn with vector-graphics

Package: wnpp Severity: normal

Bug#833433: jessie-pu: package flashplugin-nonfree/1:3.6.1+deb8u1

On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 04:59:29PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On Sat, 2016-08-06 at 05:20 +0000, Bart Martens wrote: > > Control: tag -1 - moreinfo > > > > On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 11:02:40PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: >

Bug#835649: [flashplugin-nonfree] OldStable (Wheezy) version of package is critically out of date

Seems to work just fine here on wheezy: | # cat /etc/debian_version | 7.11 | # update-flashplugin-nonfree --status | Flash Player version installed on this system : 11.2.202.632 | Flash Player version available on upstream site: 11.2.202.632 | flash-mozilla.so - auto mode |

Bug#835649: [flashplugin-nonfree] OldStable (Wheezy) version of package is critically out of date

.1 in "Stable" or 1:3.7 > "Testing" and "Unstable". Which CVEs exactly? > For the record, backporting by hand-editing in the differences between > 3.2 and 3.7 into the 3.2 version does seem to do the job Which differences exactly matter? Regards, Bart Martens

Bug#834245: RFS: arasan/19.0.1-1 [ITP] -- a strong chess engine using xboard

reopen 834245 stop Sorry my mistake, reopening.

Bug#834205: RFS: dh-elpa/1.1 -- Debian helper tools for packaging emacs lisp extensions

+0200 +++ dh-elpa-1.1/.gitattributes 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ dh-elpa-1.1/.gitignore 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 Regards, Bart Martens

Bug#834166: O: libcgic

Package: wnpp Severity: normal I hereby orphan this package, since I lack the time and interest to maintain it properly.

Bug#827582: missing ITP

Hi Lumin, Where is the ITP? There should be one, see the instructions at "new packages": https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#newpackage Regards, Bart Martens

Bug#827895: missing ITP

Hi Lumin, Where is the ITP? There should be one, see the instructions at "new packages": https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#newpackage Regards, Bart Martens

Bug#822613: missing ITP

Hi Rohan, Where is the ITP? There should be one, see the instructions at "new packages": https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#newpackage Regards, Bart Martens

Bug#829081: missing ITP

Hi Thomas, Where is the ITP? There should be one, see the instructions at "new packages": https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#newpackage Regards, Bart Martens

Bug#822149: missing ITP

Hi Herbert, Where is the ITP? There should be one, see the instructions at "new packages": https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#newpackage Regards, Bart Martens

Bug#827590: missing ITP

Hi Lumin, Where is the ITP? There should be one, see the instructions at "new packages": https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#newpackage Regards, Bart Martens

Bug#825390: missing ITP

Hi Emily, Where is the ITP? There should be one, see the instructions at "new packages": https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#newpackage Regards, Bart Martens

Bug#833653: ITP: r-cran-gsl -- GNU R package to interface the GNU GSL

package in Debian so the current maintainer can consider a switch to your implementation. Regards, Bart Martens

Bug#831228: closed by Bart Martens <ba...@debian.org> (flashplugin-nonfree: update-flashplugin-nonfree references wrong version)

ensures that the latest get-upstream-version.pl will be used. Regards, Bart Martens

Bug#820583: flashplugin-nonfree: Signature status

or install the package from unstable. Regards, Bart Martens

Bug#833741: pepperflashplugin-nonfree: Feature request?: Download from Adobe instead of Google.

; > I'm not sure if this counts as a bug, so I've marked it wishlist, Perfect. > but if it was possible to switch to downloading from the Adobe site, > it would speed up the download, and make the 32-bit version available again. Yes, I'm considering that. Regards, Bart Martens

Bug#833433: jessie-pu: package flashplugin-nonfree/1:3.6.1+deb8u1

t; also not stable across timezones. Using %Y now, see attached debdiff. Permission to upload? Regards, Bart Martens diff -Nru flashplugin-nonfree-3.6.1/debian/changelog flashplugin-nonfree-3.6.1+deb8u1/debian/changelog --- flashplugin-nonfree-3.6.1/debian/changelog 2014-12-21 10:03:31.0 +010

Bug#833433: jessie-pu: package flashplugin-nonfree/1:3.6.1+deb8u1

Control: tag -1 - moreinfo On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 03:19:59PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > Control: tag -1 moreinfo > > On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 11:38:34 +0200, Bart Martens wrote: > > > + if [ "`stat --format=%y $cachedir/get-upstream-version.pl`&quo

Bug#833512: O: kcheckers

Package: wnpp Severity: normal I hereby orphan this package because I lack the time and interest to maintain it properly.

Bug#833464: O: tomatoes -- tomato smashing game

Package: wnpp Severity: normal I hereby orphan this package. I lack the time and interest to further maintain it.

Bug#833460: O: open-cobol -- cobol compiler

Package: wnpp Severity: normal I hereby orphan this package.

Bug#833433: jessie-pu: package flashplugin-nonfree/1:3.6.1+deb8u1

-upstream-version.pl from cache. +Closes: #833413. + + -- Bart Martens <ba...@debian.org> Thu, 04 Aug 2016 10:59:38 +0200 + flashplugin-nonfree (1:3.6.1) unstable; urgency=medium * debian/control: Pre-Depends: ca-certificates. Closes: #773633. diff -Nru flashplugin-nonfree-3.6.1/

Bug#826911: pepperflashplugin-nonfree: Missing man page for update-pepperflashplugin-nonfree

beginning somewhat intentional, to avoid support calls from end users blindly using --unverified as long as the pepperflashplugin-nonfree package was fairly new. Now I see no objection against documententing it. Regards, Bart Martens

Bug#833364: O: gtkglext -- OpenGL Extension to GTK+

Package: wnpp Severity: normal I hereby orphan this package due to lack of time to maintain it properly.

Bug#826924: O: xpad -- sticky notes

Package: wnpp Severity: normal I hereby orphan this package. I don't intend to maintain it anymore since I lost interest. Anyone interested... go ahead.

Bug#826926: O: gnome-mastermind -- mastermind clone for gnome

Package: wnpp Severity: normal I hereby orphan this package. I don't intend to maintain it anymore since I lost interest. Anyone interested... go ahead.

Bug#826925: O: pipewalker -- puzzle game

Package: wnpp Severity: normal I hereby orphan this package. I don't intend to maintain it anymore since I lost interest. Anyone interested... go ahead.

Bug#826923: O: speedcrunch -- calculator

Package: wnpp Severity: normal I hereby orphan this package. I don't intend to maintain it anymore since I lost interest. Anyone interested... go ahead.

Bug#826919: O: berusky -- game

Package: wnpp Severity: normal I hereby orphan this package. I don't intend to maintain it anymore since I lost interest. Anyone interested... go ahead.

Bug#826920: O: berusky-data -- game data

Package: wnpp Severity: normal I hereby orphan this package. I don't intend to maintain it anymore since I lost interest. Anyone interested... go ahead.

Bug#826921: O: freedroidrpg -- RPG

Package: wnpp Severity: normal I hereby orphan this package. I don't intend to maintain it anymore since I lost interest. Anyone interested... go ahead.

Bug#826917: O: catdvi

Package: wnpp Severity: normal I hereby orphan this package. I don't intend to maintain it anymore since I lost interest. Anyone interested... go ahead.

Bug#826918: qcomicbook -- viewer for comic books

Package: wnpp Severity: normal I hereby orphan this package. I don't intend to maintain it anymore since I lost interest. Anyone interested... go ahead.

Bug#826915: O: gxmessage -- xmessage clone based on GTK+

Package: wnpp Severity: normal I hereby orphan this package. I don't intend to maintain it anymore since I lost interest. Anyone interested... go ahead.

Bug#826916: O: gnubik -- Rubik's cube game

Package: wnpp Severity: normal I hereby orphan this package. I don't intend to maintain it anymore since I lost interest. Anyone interested... go ahead.

Bug#826914: O: nethogs -- net top tool

Package: wnpp Severity: normal I hereby orphan this package. I don't intend to maintain it anymore since I lost interest. Anyone interested... go ahead.

Bug#826913: O: abe -- side scrolling game

Package: wnpp Severity: normal I hereby orphan this package. I don't intend to maintain it anymore since I lost interest. Anyone interested... go ahead.

Bug#802649: update-pepperflashplugin-nonfree fails in a bash script

rflashplugin-nonfree --install --verbose >> > /var/log/apt/updatepepper.log 2>&1 Yes, that's what you wrote earlier. Regards, Bart Martens

Bug#799743: freedroidrpg: newer upstream release

severity: wishlist package: freedroidrpg - Forwarded message from fluzz - Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 23:20:13 +0200 From: fluzz To: ba...@debian.org Subject: FreedroidRPG 0.16rc1 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101

Bug#789340: libio-stty-perl: diff for NMU version 0.03-1.1

On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 12:04:39PM +, Damyan Ivanov wrote: Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for libio-stty-perl (versioned as 0.03-1.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Go ahead, thanks. Regards, Bart Martens

Bug#791427: flashplugin-nonfree: support request

severity 791427 wishlist retitle 791427 flashplugin-nonfree: support request stop No such problem here. I suspect a local networking issue, not a bug in the package. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#790945: RFS: ismrmrd/1.2.3-2

reopen 790945 stop Ghislain, I see that 1.2.3-1 is in unstable. Are you looking for sponsorship for updating this package to 1.2.3-2? If yes, where is the package to sponsor? It's not on mentors at this time... Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ

Bug#782677: udd: scripts/update-upstream-status: should consider sepwatch

On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 08:30:48AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: On 29/06/15 at 16:47 +, Bart Martens wrote: On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 09:47:50PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Hi, On 28/06/15 at 09:08 +, Bart Martens wrote: It already exists. We have cgi-bin/udd-dehs which

Bug#782677: udd: scripts/update-upstream-status: should consider sepwatch

On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 08:15:49PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: On 30/06/15 at 17:47 +, Bart Martens wrote: How different is mole's data schema from UDD's? I guess you already have access to UDD's data schema. Can you access mole.watch with what you read in udd-dehs? It seems

Bug#782677: udd: scripts/update-upstream-status: should consider sepwatch

On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 09:47:50PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Hi, On 28/06/15 at 09:08 +, Bart Martens wrote: It already exists. We have cgi-bin/udd-dehs which reads from mole.watch. So I don't know why scripts/update-upstream-status would even run uscan. Because the UDD

Bug#782677: udd: scripts/update-upstream-status: should consider sepwatch

It already exists. We have cgi-bin/udd-dehs which reads from mole.watch. So I don't know why scripts/update-upstream-status would even run uscan. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#790047: devscripts: please add an option to uscan to ignore pgpsigurlmangle

Package: devscripts Severity: wishlist File: /usr/bin/uscan When the watch file contains the pgpsigurlmangle option, then uscan will use debian/upstream/signing-key.pgp or debian/upstream/signing-key.asc or debian/upstream-signing-key.pgp if present, and fail if none of these files is present. It

Bug#790047: devscripts: please add an option to uscan to ignore pgpsigurlmangle

For completeness, some context information: We are using uscan on qa.debian.org, and the focus is there reporting newer upstream versions, not downloading the new upstream files. The option pgpsigurlmangle is related to downloading the new upstream files. On qa.debian.org we don't unpack the

Bug#782677: udd: scripts/update-upstream-status: should consider sepwatch

For the record, if we want uscan results in udd, then I suggest getting them from mole.watch where they are being kept up to date, and including sepwatch. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#788217: RFS: clfft/2.4-1 [ITP Bug#783084] -- OpenCL FFT library

reopen 788217 owner 783084 Ghislain Vaillant ghisv...@gmail.com stop I had overlooked With his authorization. Reopening and setting Ghislain as the owner of the ITP. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#773633: flashplugin-nonfree: should have Pre-Depends: ca-certificates

Package: flashplugin-nonfree Version: 1:3.6 Severity: serious As illustrated below, flashplugin-nonfree should have Pre-Depends: ca-certificates. | # apt-get install flashplugin-nonfree | Reading package lists... Done | Building dependency tree | Reading state information...

Bug#773636: unblock: flashplugin-nonfree/1:3.6.1

@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +flashplugin-nonfree (1:3.6.1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * debian/control: Pre-Depends: ca-certificates. Closes: #773633. + + -- Bart Martens ba...@debian.org Sun, 21 Dec 2014 10:02:23 +0100 + flashplugin-nonfree (1:3.6) unstable; urgency=medium * debian/control: Depends: ca

Bug#773638: unblock: pepperflashplugin-nonfree/1.8.1

-21 11:38:47.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +pepperflashplugin-nonfree (1.8.1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * debian/control: Pre-Depends: ca-certificates. Closes: #773629. + + -- Bart Martens ba...@debian.org Sun, 21 Dec 2014 11:37:47 +0100 + pepperflashplugin-nonfree (1.8) unstable; urgency

Bug#767024: tracker.debian.org: Reports wrong new upstream for a native package

The same problem is on https://packages.qa.debian.org/m/mini-buildd.html . The output of https://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/udd-dehs contains this: | debian-mangled-uversion: 0.8.20 | debian-uversion: 0.8.20 | messages: Not downloading as --package was used. Use --download to force

Bug#768487: RFS: fasm

Hi Thomas, If you intend to package fasm, then please retitle RFP 513402 to ITP and set yourself as the owner. That makes clear that you are working on this, so nobody else does duplicate effort. Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org

Bug#768497: open-cobol: please follow the rename to gnu-cobol

Package: open-cobol Severity: wishlist http://sourceforge.net/projects/open-cobol/ GnuCOBOL (formerly OpenCOBOL) OpenCOBOL 1.1 continued on as GNU Cobol 1.1 Officially posted to ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gnucobol; -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject

Bug#761214: was qpid-tools orphaned ?

Hi Darryl, I see you intend to adopt qpid-tools, but was qpid-tools orphaned by the Debian Middleware Maintainers ? Or did you agree a takeover ? Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#766427: RFS: xsettingsd/0.0.20140814+74+b7312ce-1

Hi Ranga, Do you intend to adopt xsettingsd? If yes, then please retitle 763987 from RFA to ITA and set yourself as the owner. Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas

Bug#560004: ITP: lxdm -- LXDE display manager

owner 560004 Andrej N. Gritsenko and...@rep.kiev.ua stop It seems Andrej is joining the team, see RFS 765601. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#756980: klavaro: conflict with libgtkdatabox-0.9.2-0-dev

can review and upload this version I would be very grateful. It's a shame not to have a new version on stable. I intend to update the package myself. Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#765297: pepperflashplugin-nonfree: please support uncommon umask

in version 1.8, then please close this bug. Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#765636: DDPO: watch stopped to work.

processing. The source code is here : anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/qa/trunk/mole/watch-requeue/watch-requeue.pl?view=markup Look for number of days to wait before trying again. Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe

Bug#760388: pepperflashplugin-nonfree: modifies conffiles of another package (policy 10.7.3): /etc/chromium/default

/msg00232.html Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#760388: pepperflashplugin-nonfree: modifies conffile of another package

On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 07:37:56AM +, Bart Martens wrote: Hi Lucas, On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 09:21:43AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: This bug prevents pepperflashplugin-nonfree from entering testing, so I'm a bit worried to see it without activity since Sep 10th. Is something

Bug#576184: ITP: jidanni -- a natural intelligence to find many bugs

understand that there are limits to a person's time and interest. Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >