On Sat, 12 Jan 2013 10:28:01 -0800
John Darrah xyl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 08:27:16AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 20:29:43 -0800
John Darrah xyl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 07:09:33AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jan 2013
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 20:29:43 -0800
John Darrah xyl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 07:09:33AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 21:29:22 -0800
John Darrah xyl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 12:26:07PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Fri, 2012-12
On Sat, 29 Dec 2012 01:24:36 +0100
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
On Mon, 2012-12-24 at 09:14 -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
On Sun, 23 Dec 2012 09:10:34 -0500
Jeff Layton jlay...@redhat.com wrote:
[...]
I had a look at the code today and suspect that I know what the problem
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 11:20:44 +0200
Rik Theys rik.th...@esat.kuleuven.be wrote:
Hi,
On 04/24/2012 11:16 PM, Jeff Layton wrote:
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 13:35:13 -0700
Greg KHgre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:22:50PM +0200, Rik Theys wrote:
Hi,
I'm
allocating this memory
in the past.
I suspect most of those occurred when people attempt to do an NFS mount
after memory is already heavily fragmented. This allocation was
fricking huge before those patches...
That said, I'm not sure that really qualifies as stable-kernel fodder...
--
Jeff
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 11:09:33 +0200
John Hughes j...@calva.com wrote:
On 27/09/11 20:27, Jeff Layton wrote:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 14:31:32 -0400
Jeff Laytonjlay...@redhat.com wrote:
Not sure what happened here. Looks like the freeze phase of the
suspend worked. My inclination
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 14:31:32 -0400
Jeff Layton jlay...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 17:52:58 +0200
John Hughes j...@calva.com wrote:
On 23/09/11 17:09, Jeff Layton wrote:
I went ahead and attached the latest one to the RHBZ above. If you can
grab it from there and test
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 17:52:58 +0200
John Hughes j...@calva.com wrote:
On 23/09/11 17:09, Jeff Layton wrote:
I went ahead and attached the latest one to the RHBZ above. If you can
grab it from there and test it, that would be great.
Ok, I'm now testing the current patch on my Dell
the
linux-nfs@, linux-cifs@, or linux-pm@ list?
Not yet. I was planning to post the revised version next week after
John tested it.
--
Jeff Layton jlay...@redhat.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
a revised version that
includes the right header and also fixes some other cases where the NFS
code can sleep like this. I'll see if I can get something together for
3.2.
--
Jeff Layton jlay...@redhat.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
On Fri, 23 Sep 2011 17:01:20 +0200
John Hughes j...@calva.com wrote:
On 23/09/11 16:40, Jeff Layton wrote:
On Fri, 23 Sep 2011 16:30:36 +0200
John Hughesj...@calva.com wrote:
Well, after minor modifications (needed to include freezer.h in
fs/nfs/inode.c and net/sunrpc/sched.c
Package: heimdal-kdc
Version: 0.6.3-6
Followup-For: Bug #284498
Just a followup note. I've been running the patched version of this
daemon for the last couple of weeks and it has not crashed on me once.
After I rebooted my box a few days ago, the unpatched version got
started, and it started
12 matches
Mail list logo
