Bug#455743: closed by Morten Werner Forsbring [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bug#455743: fixed in cfengine2 2.2.5-1)

2008-04-28 Thread Mark Burgess
be expanded into right value, which depends my interfaces order on server. I haven't had time to test this myself, but this worked as intended before we applied the patch from upstream? - Werner -- Mark Burgess Web: http://www.iu.hio.no/~mark Tlf: +47 22453272 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Bug#455743: global.ipv4 cannot handle multiple addresses on same interface

2008-02-19 Thread Mark Burgess
? Marry christmas! :) - Werner [1] http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ [2] http://h20219.www2.hp.com/enterprise/cache/6468-0-0-0-121.html ___ Bug-cfengine mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://cfengine.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-cfengine -- Mark

Bug#448139: cfagent crashes with a segmentation fault when 31+ arguments are supplied

2007-12-01 Thread Mark Burgess
Patch applied to correct the problem as reported. Iain Patterson wrote: Quoth Mark Burgess, This is probably true, but the case cited in the mail is not a limitation of cfengine but the argument getopt code in the operating system concerned. It is normal that Unix limits to 31 args

Bug#448139: cfagent crashes with a segmentation fault when 31+ arguments are supplied

2007-11-30 Thread Mark Burgess
THank you for this analysis. The original bug message did not contain enough context to see this interaction. M Iain Patterson wrote: Quoth Mark Burgess, This is probably true, but the case cited in the mail is not a limitation of cfengine but the argument getopt code in the operating

Bug#448139: cfagent crashes with a segmentation fault when 31+ arguments are supplied

2007-11-25 Thread Mark Burgess
mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://cfengine.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-cfengine -- Mark Burgess Professor of Network and System Administration Oslo University College ~~ Work: +47 22453272Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Bug#448139: cfagent crashes with a segmentation fault when 31+ arguments are supplied

2007-11-25 Thread Mark Burgess
Morten Werner Forsbring wrote: Mark Burgess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Pardon me for saying so, but one recalls the story of the patient visiting the doctor: Doctor, doctor, it hurts when I do this. To which the answer is Then don't do that! I don't agree with your comparison here

Bug#232512: Copying the same file twice fails

2006-04-12 Thread Mark Burgess
the user was warned of this silly request - I believe that was okay, but now you get both a warning and the multiple copy honoured as suggested.) -- Mark Burgess Professor of Network and System Administration Oslo University College