Bug#1054514: (subset) [PATCH v2 1/1] Revert "drm/qxl: simplify qxl_fence_wait"

2024-04-05 Thread Maxime Ripard
On Thu, 04 Apr 2024 19:14:48 +0100, Alex Constantino wrote: > This reverts commit 5a838e5d5825c85556011478abde708251cc0776. > > Changes from commit 5a838e5d5825 ("drm/qxl: simplify qxl_fence_wait") would > result in a '[TTM] Buffer eviction failed' exception whenever it reached a > timeout. > Due

Bug#1054514: [PATCH 1/1] drm/qxl: fixes qxl_fence_wait

2024-03-27 Thread Maxime Ripard
Hi, On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 04:25:48PM +0100, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote: > On 08.03.24 02:08, Alex Constantino wrote: > > Fix OOM scenario by doing multiple notifications to the OOM handler through > > a busy wait logic. > > Changes from commit 5a838e5d5825 ("drm/qxl:

Bug#793185: [linux-sunxi] Re: forwarding a bug: cpufreq missing in debian stable on a cuibeboard

2015-07-31 Thread Maxime Ripard
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 03:23:33PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, On 24-07-15 15:16, Maxime Ripard wrote: On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 02:58:31PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: There is slightly more to it then those 5 lines, but yes we should enable voltage scaling on more boards. This mostly

Bug#793185: [linux-sunxi] forwarding a bug: cpufreq missing in debian stable on a cuibeboard

2015-07-24 Thread Maxime Ripard
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 08:34:34AM +0200, Leonardo Canducci wrote: Attaching kernel config files from /boot (3.16, 4.0 and 4.1 from stable, unstable and experimental). We're using the cpufreq-dt driver, that is compiled as a module. Is the module loaded? Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free

Bug#793185: [linux-sunxi] forwarding a bug: cpufreq missing in debian stable on a cuibeboard

2015-07-24 Thread Maxime Ripard
, could you provide it please? Thanks, Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#793185: [linux-sunxi] Re: forwarding a bug: cpufreq missing in debian stable on a cuibeboard

2015-07-24 Thread Maxime Ripard
I guess?) is a good thing when it comes to something that can permanently damage a board. I'd expect that such changes would be carefully done and tested before being submitted. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com

Bug#793185: [linux-sunxi] Re: forwarding a bug: cpufreq missing in debian stable on a cuibeboard

2015-07-24 Thread Maxime Ripard
for something that might blow up your board. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#793185: [linux-sunxi] Re: forwarding a bug: cpufreq missing in debian stable on a cuibeboard

2015-07-24 Thread Maxime Ripard
-cubietruck.dts#L108-L110 Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#793185: [linux-sunxi] Re: forwarding a bug: cpufreq missing in debian stable on a cuibeboard

2015-07-24 Thread Maxime Ripard
puzzles me is that exactly the same kernel (I used Igor Pečovnik's build system) provides working cpufreq support on 5 A20 devices and one it fails. And none of those 5 use CPU voltage scaling. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free

Bug#793185: [linux-sunxi] Re: forwarding a bug: cpufreq missing in debian stable on a cuibeboard

2015-07-24 Thread Maxime Ripard
on the frequency, not the voltage. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature