Bug#1001274: scowl source has (probably outdated?) problematic license conditions

2021-12-07 Thread Don Armstrong
On Tue, 07 Dec 2021, Gernot Hillier wrote: > The Debian copyright however cites from r/pos/README that "The MWords > package was explicitly placed in the public domain". To me at least, > it's unclear whether the both READMEs were considered and if yes, it > would really help to add some

Bug#1001274: scowl source has (probably outdated?) problematic license conditions

2021-12-07 Thread Gernot Hillier
Source: scowl Version: 2019.10.06-1 During licensing checks of the "scowl" sources, we identified two problematic files. r/pos/README-orig as well as r/mwords/README. Both say: [...] This documentation, software and/or database was developed and copyrighted by Grady Ward and is licensed, not