Bug#1034387: update youtube-dl control file to reflect? transitional package

2023-06-21 Thread Andreas Tille
Am Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 06:13:27PM -0400 schrieb Andres Salomon: > > Andreas, were you planning to do an upload? Because I was about to open a > bug against ftp.debian.org to request removal of the package now that > bookworm is released. I can wait if you want, but I don't see much point in >

Bug#1034387: update youtube-dl control file to reflect transitional package

2023-06-21 Thread Andres Salomon
On Sun, 4 Jun 2023 13:42:23 +0200 Andreas Tille wrote: > Control: tags -1 pending > > Am Sat, Jun 03, 2023 at 12:54:33PM -0400 schrieb Jesse Rhodes: > > The debian/control fields for youtube-dl still have a lot of leftover > > information from when it was a binary package, which should be

Bug#1034387: update youtube-dl control file to reflect transitional package

2023-06-04 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: tags -1 pending Am Sat, Jun 03, 2023 at 12:54:33PM -0400 schrieb Jesse Rhodes: > The debian/control fields for youtube-dl still have a lot of leftover > information from when it was a binary package, which should be cleaned > up to reflect what the package actually does at present.

Bug#1034387: update youtube-dl control file to reflect transitional package

2023-06-03 Thread Jesse Rhodes
Control: retitle -1 update youtube-dl control file to reflect transitional package Control: tags -1 patch thanks Hi, The debian/control fields for youtube-dl still have a lot of leftover information from when it was a binary package, which should be cleaned up to reflect what the package