On Mon, 18 Sep 2023 09:23:19 -0300 Thiago Andrade
wrote:
> I'm waiting for this upgrade. After I'll try to upgrade gobuster to
> 3.6.0 version.
Hello Thiago,
the new package was uploaded and is now in unstable.
However, after manually triggering the autopkgtests two times, I noticed
that a
Hi Arnaud Rebillout
I'm waiting for this upgrade. After I'll try to upgrade gobuster to
3.6.0 version.
Regards.
Thanks a lot!
On 18/09/2023 05:19, Arnaud Rebillout wrote:
I tried to rebuild the package locally, works for me. Tried to run
autopkgtests in GitLab CI: worked [1]. It hints at
I tried to rebuild the package locally, works for me. Tried to run
autopkgtests in GitLab CI: worked [1]. It hints at flaky tests indeed...
I noticed that in Debian we package 2.2.0, however upstream is at
version 3.0.0, with significant changes.
We have only two reverse build-deps: gobuster
On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 3:31 AM Thiago Andrade wrote:
>
> I tested this package on an amd64 PorterBox and the bug seems to have
> been resolved by disabling two tests.
> I've attached this diff, feel free to test it and upload it as soon as
> possible.
This doesn't make sense. Could you
I tested this package on an amd64 PorterBox and the bug seems to have
been resolved by disabling two tests.
I've attached this diff, feel free to test it and upload it as soon as
possible.
Regards
--
...
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Thiago
On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 05:55:07PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
>...
> On Wed, 31 May 2023 08:31:25 -0300 Thiago Andrade
> wrote:
> > I've tested golang-github-pin-tftp locally and everything looks perfect.
>
> I looked at the results on the reproducible build infrastructure and the
> package seems
Hi all,
On Wed, 31 May 2023 08:31:25 -0300 Thiago Andrade
wrote:
I've tested golang-github-pin-tftp locally and everything looks perfect.
I looked at the results on the reproducible build infrastructure and the
package seems to regularly fail. This may hint that the tests are flaky.
Also
Hey folks.
This bug is affecting the gobuster package that I maintain.
I've tested golang-github-pin-tftp locally and everything looks perfect.
It looks like a false positive on the Build.
If anyone can see this by July 1st, it will be important that these
packages are not automatically removed
Source: golang-github-pin-tftp
Version: 2.2.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230517 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (bookworm), your package failed
to build on amd64.
Relevant part
9 matches
Mail list logo
