Hello,
I haven't seen that many of these. A few, yes, maybe 3?
3 under my personal ddpo, e.g. borgbackup this one and some others.
In any case, I agree with your proposal, borgbackup is already "fixed" in some
way, and I plan to workaround
vulndb too.
G.
On balance, it still seems like
Hi Gianfranco (2023.09.26_16:55:49_+0200)
> hello, I see a TON of FTBFS bugs for python failures
> I suspect the reason for them to fail is
> * Remove *.egg-info directories in clean step, as part of Debian's wider
> effort to improve clean targets. Thanks Stuart Prescott for the patch.
control: reassign -1 dh-python
control: found -1 6.20230825
control: affects -1 python-vulndb borgbackup
hello, I see a TON of FTBFS bugs for python failures
I suspect the reason for them to fail is
* Remove *.egg-info directories in clean step, as part of Debian's wider
effort to
Source: python-vulndb
Version: 0.1.3-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230925 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules build
4 matches
Mail list logo