Bug#1055463: sysvinit-core: Please entirely remove SysVinit

2023-11-07 Thread Patrik Schindler
Am 07.11.2023 um 19:50 schrieb Thorsten Glaser : >> Small but important. A system without (a running) logging daemon is not > > Hmh, but… > “From bookworm, rsyslog is no longer installed by default.” I'm solely talking about system upgrades. Which — at last in my world — happen much more

Bug#1055463: sysvinit-core: Please entirely remove SysVinit

2023-11-07 Thread Thorsten Glaser
(getting OT…) On Tue, 7 Nov 2023, Ottavio Caruso wrote: >Am Mo., 6. Nov. 2023 um 21:09 Uhr schrieb Axel Beckert : >> Debian is about choice, not about spoon-feeding users and leaving them >> without choice in many places like at least one well-known Debian >> derivative does. Yeah, I wish.

Bug#1055463: sysvinit-core: Please entirely remove SysVinit

2023-11-07 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Tue, 7 Nov 2023, Patrik Schindler wrote: >Reiterating what I've stated in #1055466 in other words… leaving aside >recommends-are-default, missing recommends IMHO should not half-break a >system at upgrade time. Yes… but, again, that was a rather new thing back then. >> In trixie, o-s-s

Bug#1055463: sysvinit-core: Please entirely remove SysVinit

2023-11-07 Thread Patrik Schindler
Am 07.11.2023 um 10:58 schrieb Matthew Vernon : > do feel free to propose some text for them). How would be the proper way to do so? > If you find future init scripts missing that aren't in > orphan-sysvinit-scripts and the relevant package maintainer isn't willing to > restore them, do file

Bug#1055463: sysvinit-core: Please entirely remove SysVinit

2023-11-07 Thread Matthew Vernon
Hi, On 07/11/2023 01:14, Patrik Schindler wrote: Am 07.11.2023 um 01:59 schrieb Thorsten Glaser : I have sysvinit-core installed and orphan-sysvinit-scripts was not pulled in automatically. Yeah, it’s not. As I'm learning from a discussion in bug #1055466, this is due to

Bug#1055463: sysvinit-core: Please entirely remove SysVinit

2023-11-07 Thread Ottavio Caruso
Am Mo., 6. Nov. 2023 um 21:09 Uhr schrieb Axel Beckert : > > Debian is about choice, not about spoon-feeding users and leaving them > without choice in many places like at least one well-known Debian > derivative does. You must be stuck at 2004. Debian has been Canonical's changing room since

Bug#1055463: sysvinit-core: Please entirely remove SysVinit

2023-11-07 Thread Patrik Schindler
Am 07.11.2023 um 02:28 schrieb Thorsten Glaser : >> As I'm learning from a discussion in bug #1055466, this is due to >> orphan-sysvinit-scripts "only" being recommended and not a hard dependency. > > Recommends count, they are installed by default since, uh, lenny or so (a > decision I still

Bug#1055463: sysvinit-core: Please entirely remove SysVinit

2023-11-06 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Tue, 7 Nov 2023, Patrik Schindler wrote: >>> I have sysvinit-core installed and orphan-sysvinit-scripts was not pulled >>> in automatically. >> Yeah, it’s not. > >As I'm learning from a discussion in bug #1055466, this is due to >orphan-sysvinit-scripts "only" being recommended and not a hard

Bug#1055463: sysvinit-core: Please entirely remove SysVinit

2023-11-06 Thread Patrik Schindler
Am 07.11.2023 um 01:59 schrieb Thorsten Glaser : >> I have sysvinit-core installed and orphan-sysvinit-scripts was not pulled in >> automatically. > Yeah, it’s not. As I'm learning from a discussion in bug #1055466, this is due to orphan-sysvinit-scripts "only" being recommended and not a hard

Bug#1055463: sysvinit-core: Please entirely remove SysVinit

2023-11-06 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Tue, 7 Nov 2023, Patrik Schindler wrote: >I have sysvinit-core installed and orphan-sysvinit-scripts was not >pulled in automatically. Yeah, it’s not. The release notes should have mentioned this, but for some reason, no text made it there. >For Debian 11, there was no need for this package

Bug#1055463: sysvinit-core: Please entirely remove SysVinit

2023-11-06 Thread Patrik Schindler
Am 06.11.2023 um 21:20 schrieb Matthias Geiger : > This is caused by package maintainers just dropping init scripts, and not > honoring the GR about init systems in Debian. May I ask you to elaborate? What is GR? > The init-diversity team has been putting a lot of work into maintaining >

Bug#1055463: sysvinit-core: Please entirely remove SysVinit

2023-11-06 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi, Patrik Schindler wrote: > After I've upgraded my server to Bookworm today, I'll now do a rollback from > backup because of numerous issues with many services not coming up > anymore. Works fine for me, especially in Bookworm. Running servers as well as workstations with it. > For this

Bug#1055463: sysvinit-core: Please entirely remove SysVinit

2023-11-06 Thread Matthias Geiger
On 06.11.23 21:09, Thorsten Glaser wrote: On Mon, 6 Nov 2023, Patrik Schindler wrote: For this reason, I propose to remove SysVinit completely from the next Debian Uhm NO‽ *shaking head*, //mirabilos This is caused by package maintainers just dropping init scripts, and not honoring the GR

Bug#1055463: sysvinit-core: Please entirely remove SysVinit

2023-11-06 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Mon, 6 Nov 2023, Patrik Schindler wrote: >For this reason, I propose to remove SysVinit completely from the next Debian Uhm NO‽ *shaking head*, //mirabilos

Bug#1055463: sysvinit-core: Please entirely remove SysVinit

2023-11-06 Thread Patrik Schindler
Package: sysvinit-core Version: 3.06-4 Severity: wishlist After I've upgraded my server to Bookworm today, I'll now do a rollback from backup because of numerous issues with many services not coming up anymore. All due to the decreasing willingness of maintainers to support SysVinit, by